i5-12400 vs Core2 Duo E7400 - The Callisto Protocol RTX 3080 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-12400 Core2 Duo E7400

Multi-Thread Performance

16800 Pts
1775 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3240 Pts
1145 Pts

The Callisto Protocol

i5-12400 vs Core2 Duo E7400 in The Callisto Protocol using RTX 3080 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-12400 Core2 Duo E7400

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
51.3 FPS
1080p
21.9 FPS
1440p
36.4 FPS
1440p
15.5 FPS
2160p
18.3 FPS
2160p
7.8 FPS
w1440p
29.3 FPS
w1440p
12.5 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
89.4 FPS
1080p
42.8 FPS
1440p
66.5 FPS
1440p
31.6 FPS
2160p
36.6 FPS
2160p
17.3 FPS
w1440p
55.2 FPS
w1440p
26.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
127.5 FPS
1080p
63.7 FPS
1440p
96.7 FPS
1440p
47.8 FPS
2160p
54.9 FPS
2160p
26.7 FPS
w1440p
81.0 FPS
w1440p
39.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
203.7 FPS
1080p
105.6 FPS
1440p
157.0 FPS
1440p
80.1 FPS
2160p
91.5 FPS
2160p
45.7 FPS
w1440p
132.7 FPS
w1440p
67.3 FPS
i5-12400
  • The i5-12400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-12400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i5-12400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Core2 Duo E7400
  • The Core2 Duo E7400 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i5-12400 vs Core2 Duo E7400 specifications

i5-12400 vs Core2 Duo E7400 Architecture

i5-12400 Core2 Duo E7400
CodenameAlder Lake-SWolfdale
GenerationCore i5 (Alder Lake-S)Core 2 Duo (Wolfdale)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Part#SRL4V SRL5YSLGW3
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i5-12400 vs Core2 Duo E7400 Cache

i5-12400 Core2 Duo E7400
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)3MB (shared)

i5-12400 vs Core2 Duo E7400 Cores

i5-12400 Core2 Duo E7400
# of Cores62
# of Threads122
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i5-12400 vs Core2 Duo E7400 Performance

i5-12400 Core2 Duo E7400
Base Clock100 MHz266 MHz
Frequency2.5 GHz2.8 GHz
Multiplier25.0x10.5x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzN/A

i5-12400 vs Core2 Duo E7400 Physical

i5-12400 Core2 Duo E7400
Die Size163 mm²82 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA6
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 775

Compare i5-12400 vs Core2 Duo E7400 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments