i5-12400 vs i9-12900K - The Callisto Protocol RTX 3080 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-12400 i9-12900K

Multi-Thread Performance

16800 Pts
28791 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3240 Pts
3903 Pts

The Callisto Protocol

i5-12400 vs i9-12900K in The Callisto Protocol using RTX 3080 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-12400 i9-12900K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
51.3 FPS
1080p
54.2 FPS
1440p
36.4 FPS
1440p
37.5 FPS
2160p
18.3 FPS
2160p
18.8 FPS
w1440p
29.3 FPS
w1440p
30.1 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
89.4 FPS
1080p
93.7 FPS
1440p
66.5 FPS
1440p
68.3 FPS
2160p
36.6 FPS
2160p
37.5 FPS
w1440p
55.2 FPS
w1440p
56.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
127.5 FPS
1080p
133.2 FPS
1440p
96.7 FPS
1440p
99.1 FPS
2160p
54.9 FPS
2160p
56.2 FPS
w1440p
81.0 FPS
w1440p
82.8 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
203.7 FPS
1080p
212.2 FPS
1440p
157.0 FPS
1440p
160.6 FPS
2160p
91.5 FPS
2160p
93.5 FPS
w1440p
132.7 FPS
w1440p
135.5 FPS
i5-12400
  • The i5-12400 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i9-12900K
  • The i9-12900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i9-12900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-12900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-12900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i5-12400 vs i9-12900K specifications

i5-12400 vs i9-12900K Architecture

i5-12400 i9-12900K
CodenameAlder Lake-SAlder Lake
ECC MemoryNoNo
GenerationCore i5 (Alder Lake-S)Core i9 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4-3200 MHz Dual-channel
PCI-ExpressGen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only)Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only)
Part#SRL4V SRL5Yunknown
Production StatusActiveActive
Release DateJan 4th, 2022Nov 4th, 2021

i5-12400 vs i9-12900K Cache

i5-12400 i9-12900K
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)14MB (shared)
Cache L318MB (shared)30MB (shared)

i5-12400 vs i9-12900K Cores

i5-12400 i9-12900K
# of Cores616
# of Threads1224
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730UHD Graphics 770
SMP # CPUs11

i5-12400 vs i9-12900K Performance

i5-12400 i9-12900K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency2.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier25.0x32.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP65 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzup to 5.2 GHz

i5-12400 vs i9-12900K Physical

i5-12400 i9-12900K
Die Size163 mm²unknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA1700
Process Size10 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1700
tJMax100°C100°C

Compare i5-12400 vs i9-12900K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments