i5-12400 vs i5-4670 - The Callisto Protocol RTX 3080 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-12400 i5-4670

Multi-Thread Performance

16800 Pts
7435 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3240 Pts
2154 Pts

The Callisto Protocol

i5-12400 vs i5-4670 in The Callisto Protocol using RTX 3080 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-12400 i5-4670

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
51.3 FPS
1080p
40.8 FPS
1440p
36.4 FPS
1440p
28.9 FPS
2160p
18.3 FPS
2160p
14.5 FPS
w1440p
29.3 FPS
w1440p
23.2 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
89.4 FPS
1080p
73.4 FPS
1440p
66.5 FPS
1440p
54.5 FPS
2160p
36.6 FPS
2160p
29.8 FPS
w1440p
55.2 FPS
w1440p
45.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
127.5 FPS
1080p
106.1 FPS
1440p
96.7 FPS
1440p
80.1 FPS
2160p
54.9 FPS
2160p
45.2 FPS
w1440p
81.0 FPS
w1440p
66.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
203.7 FPS
1080p
171.3 FPS
1440p
157.0 FPS
1440p
131.3 FPS
2160p
91.5 FPS
2160p
75.9 FPS
w1440p
132.7 FPS
w1440p
110.5 FPS
i5-12400
  • The i5-12400 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-12400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-12400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i5-12400 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i5-12400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i5-4670
  • The i5-4670 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-4670 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i5-12400 vs i5-4670 specifications

i5-12400 vs i5-4670 Architecture

i5-12400 i5-4670
CodenameAlder Lake-SHaswell
GenerationCore i5 (Alder Lake-S)Core i5 (Haswell)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRL4V SRL5YSR14D
Production StatusActiveunknown

i5-12400 vs i5-4670 Cache

i5-12400 i5-4670
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L318MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i5-12400 vs i5-4670 Cores

i5-12400 i5-4670
# of Cores64
# of Threads124
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730Intel HD 4600
SMP # CPUs11

i5-12400 vs i5-4670 Performance

i5-12400 i5-4670
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency2.5 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier25.0x34.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W84 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzup to 3.8 GHz

i5-12400 vs i5-4670 Physical

i5-12400 i5-4670
Die Size163 mm²177 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA12C
Process Size10 nm22 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1150

Compare i5-12400 vs i5-4670 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments