i5-12400 vs i3-6320 - The Callisto Protocol RTX 3080 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-12400 i3-6320

Multi-Thread Performance

16800 Pts
6047 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3240 Pts
2236 Pts

The Callisto Protocol

i5-12400 vs i3-6320 in The Callisto Protocol using RTX 3080 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-12400 i3-6320

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
51.3 FPS
1080p
30.1 FPS
1440p
36.4 FPS
1440p
21.4 FPS
2160p
18.3 FPS
2160p
10.7 FPS
w1440p
29.3 FPS
w1440p
17.2 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
89.4 FPS
1080p
56.5 FPS
1440p
66.5 FPS
1440p
42.0 FPS
2160p
36.6 FPS
2160p
22.8 FPS
w1440p
55.2 FPS
w1440p
34.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
127.5 FPS
1080p
82.8 FPS
1440p
96.7 FPS
1440p
62.5 FPS
2160p
54.9 FPS
2160p
35.0 FPS
w1440p
81.0 FPS
w1440p
52.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
203.7 FPS
1080p
135.5 FPS
1440p
157.0 FPS
1440p
103.7 FPS
2160p
91.5 FPS
2160p
59.3 FPS
w1440p
132.7 FPS
w1440p
87.1 FPS
i5-12400
  • The i5-12400 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-12400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-12400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i5-12400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-6320
  • The i3-6320 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-6320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i5-12400 vs i3-6320 specifications

i5-12400 vs i3-6320 Architecture

i5-12400 i3-6320
CodenameAlder Lake-SSkylake
GenerationCore i5 (Alder Lake-S)Core i3 (Skylake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRL4V SRL5YSR2H9
Production StatusActiveActive

i5-12400 vs i3-6320 Cache

i5-12400 i3-6320
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L318MB (shared)4MB (shared)

i5-12400 vs i3-6320 Cores

i5-12400 i3-6320
# of Cores62
# of Threads124
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730Intel HD 530
SMP # CPUs11

i5-12400 vs i3-6320 Performance

i5-12400 i3-6320
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency2.5 GHz3.9 GHz
Multiplier25.0x39.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W51 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzN/A

i5-12400 vs i3-6320 Physical

i5-12400 i3-6320
Die Size163 mm²150 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16A
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1151

Compare i5-12400 vs i3-6320 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments