i5-12400 vs Phenom II X4 920 - The Callisto Protocol GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-12400 Phenom II X4 920

Multi-Thread Performance

16800 Pts
3399 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3240 Pts
964 Pts

The Callisto Protocol

i5-12400 vs Phenom II X4 920 in The Callisto Protocol using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-12400 Phenom II X4 920

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
15.9 FPS
1080p
6.3 FPS
1440p
11.4 FPS
1440p
4.5 FPS
2160p
5.6 FPS
2160p
2.2 FPS
w1440p
9.1 FPS
w1440p
3.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
32.4 FPS
1080p
14.3 FPS
1440p
24.2 FPS
1440p
10.6 FPS
2160p
12.9 FPS
2160p
5.6 FPS
w1440p
19.8 FPS
w1440p
8.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
48.8 FPS
1080p
22.3 FPS
1440p
36.9 FPS
1440p
16.7 FPS
2160p
20.1 FPS
2160p
8.9 FPS
w1440p
30.5 FPS
w1440p
13.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
81.7 FPS
1080p
38.2 FPS
1440p
62.4 FPS
1440p
28.8 FPS
2160p
34.6 FPS
2160p
15.7 FPS
w1440p
51.9 FPS
w1440p
23.9 FPS
i5-12400
  • The i5-12400 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-12400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-12400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i5-12400 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i5-12400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Phenom II X4 920
  • The Phenom II X4 920 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i5-12400 vs Phenom II X4 920 specifications

i5-12400 vs Phenom II X4 920 Architecture

i5-12400 Phenom II X4 920
CodenameAlder Lake-SDeneb
GenerationCore i5 (Alder Lake-S)Phenom II X4 (Deneb)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRL4V SRL5YHDX920XCJ4DGIHDX920XCGIBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i5-12400 vs Phenom II X4 920 Cache

i5-12400 Phenom II X4 920
Cache L180K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L318MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i5-12400 vs Phenom II X4 920 Cores

i5-12400 Phenom II X4 920
# of Cores64
# of Threads124
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i5-12400 vs Phenom II X4 920 Performance

i5-12400 Phenom II X4 920
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency2.5 GHz2.8 GHz
Multiplier25.0x14.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzN/A

i5-12400 vs Phenom II X4 920 Physical

i5-12400 Phenom II X4 920
Die Size163 mm²258 mm²
PackageFC-LGA16AµPGA
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3

Compare i5-12400 vs Phenom II X4 920 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments