i5-11400 vs Core2 Duo E4600 - The Callisto Protocol RTX 3070 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-11400 Core2 Duo E4600

Multi-Thread Performance

14000 Pts
1384 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2700 Pts
888 Pts

The Callisto Protocol

i5-11400 vs Core2 Duo E4600 in The Callisto Protocol using RTX 3070 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-11400 Core2 Duo E4600

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
39.4 FPS
1080p
12.8 FPS
1440p
28.0 FPS
1440p
9.1 FPS
2160p
14.1 FPS
2160p
4.6 FPS
w1440p
22.5 FPS
w1440p
7.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
71.3 FPS
1080p
26.7 FPS
1440p
53.0 FPS
1440p
19.8 FPS
2160p
29.1 FPS
2160p
10.8 FPS
w1440p
43.8 FPS
w1440p
16.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
103.1 FPS
1080p
40.7 FPS
1440p
78.1 FPS
1440p
30.5 FPS
2160p
44.1 FPS
2160p
17.0 FPS
w1440p
65.2 FPS
w1440p
25.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
166.8 FPS
1080p
68.6 FPS
1440p
128.1 FPS
1440p
51.9 FPS
2160p
74.2 FPS
2160p
29.4 FPS
w1440p
107.9 FPS
w1440p
43.2 FPS
i5-11400
  • The i5-11400 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-11400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-11400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-11400 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i5-11400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Core2 Duo E4600
  • The Core2 Duo E4600 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i5-11400 vs Core2 Duo E4600 specifications

i5-11400 vs Core2 Duo E4600 Architecture

i5-11400 Core2 Duo E4600
CodenameRocket LakeAllendale
GenerationCore i5 (Rocket Lake-S) Core 2 Duo (Allendale)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Part#unknownHH80557PG0562M
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedMar 16th, 2021Oct 2007

i5-11400 vs Core2 Duo E4600 Cache

i5-11400 Core2 Duo E4600
Cache L164K (per core)64K
Cache L2256K (per core)2MB

i5-11400 vs Core2 Duo E4600 Cores

i5-11400 Core2 Duo E4600
# of Cores62
# of Threads122
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i5-11400 vs Core2 Duo E4600 Features

i5-11400 Core2 Duo E4600
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 EIST Intel 64 iAMT2 VT

i5-11400 vs Core2 Duo E4600 Notes

i5-11400 Core2 Duo E4600

i5-11400 vs Core2 Duo E4600 Performance

i5-11400 Core2 Duo E4600
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency2.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Multiplier26.0x12.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable0.9 V

i5-11400 vs Core2 Duo E4600 Physical

i5-11400 Core2 Duo E4600
Die Sizeunknown111 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA6
Process Size14 nm65 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 775
Transistorsunknown167 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i5-11400 vs Core2 Duo E4600 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments