i5-11400 vs Athlon II X2 245 - The Callisto Protocol GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-11400 Athlon II X2 245

Multi-Thread Performance

14000 Pts
1662 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2700 Pts
951 Pts

The Callisto Protocol

i5-11400 vs Athlon II X2 245 in The Callisto Protocol using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-11400 Athlon II X2 245

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
15.8 FPS
1080p
5.8 FPS
1440p
11.3 FPS
1440p
4.2 FPS
2160p
5.6 FPS
2160p
2.1 FPS
w1440p
9.0 FPS
w1440p
3.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
32.2 FPS
1080p
13.3 FPS
1440p
24.0 FPS
1440p
9.9 FPS
2160p
12.9 FPS
2160p
5.3 FPS
w1440p
19.6 FPS
w1440p
8.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
48.6 FPS
1080p
20.7 FPS
1440p
36.6 FPS
1440p
15.7 FPS
2160p
20.1 FPS
2160p
8.6 FPS
w1440p
30.2 FPS
w1440p
12.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
81.3 FPS
1080p
35.7 FPS
1440p
62.0 FPS
1440p
27.2 FPS
2160p
34.6 FPS
2160p
15.0 FPS
w1440p
51.4 FPS
w1440p
22.2 FPS
i5-11400
  • The i5-11400 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-11400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-11400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-11400 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i5-11400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X2 245
  • The Athlon II X2 245 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i5-11400 vs Athlon II X2 245 specifications

i5-11400 vs Athlon II X2 245 Architecture

i5-11400 Athlon II X2 245
CodenameRocket LakeRegor
GenerationCore i5 (Rocket Lake-S) Athlon II X2 (Regor)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownADX245OCK23GQ
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedMar 16th, 2021Jul 2009

i5-11400 vs Athlon II X2 245 Cache

i5-11400 Athlon II X2 245
Cache L164K (per core)256K
Cache L2256K (per core)2MB

i5-11400 vs Athlon II X2 245 Cores

i5-11400 Athlon II X2 245
# of Cores62
# of Threads122
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i5-11400 vs Athlon II X2 245 Features

i5-11400 Athlon II X2 245
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX 3DNow! SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A AMD64 NX bit AMD-V

i5-11400 vs Athlon II X2 245 Notes

i5-11400 Athlon II X2 245

i5-11400 vs Athlon II X2 245 Performance

i5-11400 Athlon II X2 245
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency2.6 GHz2.9 GHz
Multiplier26.0x14.5x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.25 V

i5-11400 vs Athlon II X2 245 Physical

i5-11400 Athlon II X2 245
Die Sizeunknown117 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1200µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown410 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i5-11400 vs Athlon II X2 245 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments