i5-10400 vs i7-13700K - The Callisto Protocol RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-10400 i7-13700K

Multi-Thread Performance

12716 Pts
28603 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2609 Pts
4521 Pts

The Callisto Protocol

i5-10400 vs i7-13700K in The Callisto Protocol using RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-10400 i7-13700K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
40.8 FPS
1080p
45.4 FPS
1440p
29.1 FPS
1440p
31.0 FPS
2160p
14.6 FPS
2160p
15.5 FPS
w1440p
23.3 FPS
w1440p
24.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
73.4 FPS
1080p
80.5 FPS
1440p
54.8 FPS
1440p
57.9 FPS
2160p
30.0 FPS
2160p
31.6 FPS
w1440p
45.2 FPS
w1440p
47.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
106.1 FPS
1080p
115.6 FPS
1440p
80.6 FPS
1440p
84.8 FPS
2160p
45.5 FPS
2160p
47.8 FPS
w1440p
67.1 FPS
w1440p
70.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
171.3 FPS
1080p
185.8 FPS
1440p
132.0 FPS
1440p
138.7 FPS
2160p
76.3 FPS
2160p
80.1 FPS
w1440p
110.9 FPS
w1440p
116.9 FPS
i5-10400
  • The i5-10400 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-10400 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i5-10400 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i7-13700K
  • The i7-13700K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i7-13700K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i7-13700K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i7-13700K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i5-10400 vs i7-13700K specifications

i5-10400 vs i7-13700K Architecture

i5-10400 i7-13700K
CodenameComet LakeRaptor Lake-S
GenerationCore i5 (Comet Lake)Core i7 (Raptor Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Part#unknownSRMB8
Production StatusActiveActive

i5-10400 vs i7-13700K Cache

i5-10400 i7-13700K
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)2MB (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)30MB (shared)

i5-10400 vs i7-13700K Cores

i5-10400 i7-13700K
# of Cores616
# of Threads1224
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 630UHD Graphics 770
SMP # CPUs11

i5-10400 vs i7-13700K Features

i5-10400 i7-13700K

i5-10400 vs i7-13700K Notes

i5-10400 i7-13700K

i5-10400 vs i7-13700K Performance

i5-10400 i7-13700K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency2.9 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier29.0x34.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP65 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzup to 5.4 GHz

i5-10400 vs i7-13700K Physical

i5-10400 i7-13700K
Die Sizeunknown257 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1700
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i5-10400 vs i7-13700K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments