i5-10400 vs i3-7320 - The Callisto Protocol GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-10400 i3-7320

Multi-Thread Performance

12716 Pts
6541 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2609 Pts
2364 Pts

The Callisto Protocol

i5-10400 vs i3-7320 in The Callisto Protocol using GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-10400 i3-7320

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
21.6 FPS
1080p
17.2 FPS
1440p
15.3 FPS
1440p
12.2 FPS
2160p
7.7 FPS
2160p
6.1 FPS
w1440p
12.3 FPS
w1440p
9.8 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
42.3 FPS
1080p
34.7 FPS
1440p
31.3 FPS
1440p
25.6 FPS
2160p
17.1 FPS
2160p
13.9 FPS
w1440p
25.8 FPS
w1440p
21.1 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
63.0 FPS
1080p
52.1 FPS
1440p
47.3 FPS
1440p
39.1 FPS
2160p
26.4 FPS
2160p
21.7 FPS
w1440p
39.3 FPS
w1440p
32.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
104.4 FPS
1080p
87.1 FPS
1440p
79.3 FPS
1440p
66.0 FPS
2160p
45.2 FPS
2160p
37.2 FPS
w1440p
66.4 FPS
w1440p
55.1 FPS
i5-10400
  • The i5-10400 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-10400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-10400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i5-10400 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i3-7320
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-7320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i5-10400 vs i3-7320 specifications

i5-10400 vs i3-7320 Architecture

i5-10400 i3-7320
CodenameComet LakeKaby Lake
GenerationCore i5 (Comet Lake)Core i3 (Kaby Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#unknownSR358
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedMay 2020Jan 2017

i5-10400 vs i3-7320 Cache

i5-10400 i3-7320
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)4MB (shared)

i5-10400 vs i3-7320 Cores

i5-10400 i3-7320
# of Cores62
# of Threads124
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 630Intel HD 630
SMP # CPUs11

i5-10400 vs i3-7320 Features

i5-10400 i3-7320
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.1 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x HTT AES-NI TSX CLMUL FMA3

i5-10400 vs i3-7320 Notes

i5-10400 i3-7320

i5-10400 vs i3-7320 Performance

i5-10400 i3-7320
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency2.9 GHz4.1 GHz
Multiplier29.0x41.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W51 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzN/A
Voltagevariableunknown

i5-10400 vs i3-7320 Physical

i5-10400 i3-7320
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA1151
Process Size14 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1151
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax72°C65°C

Compare i5-10400 vs i3-7320 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments