i5-10400 vs i3-540 - The Callisto Protocol RTX 4080 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-10400 i3-540

Multi-Thread Performance

12716 Pts
2687 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2609 Pts
1224 Pts

The Callisto Protocol

i5-10400 vs i3-540 in The Callisto Protocol using RTX 4080 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-10400 i3-540

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
70.4 FPS
1080p
19.8 FPS
1440p
50.0 FPS
1440p
14.1 FPS
2160p
25.0 FPS
2160p
7.0 FPS
w1440p
40.1 FPS
w1440p
11.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
117.1 FPS
1080p
39.2 FPS
1440p
87.4 FPS
1440p
29.1 FPS
2160p
48.1 FPS
2160p
15.7 FPS
w1440p
72.3 FPS
w1440p
24.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
163.8 FPS
1080p
58.6 FPS
1440p
124.9 FPS
1440p
44.1 FPS
2160p
71.1 FPS
2160p
24.4 FPS
w1440p
104.6 FPS
w1440p
36.6 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
257.2 FPS
1080p
97.5 FPS
1440p
199.8 FPS
1440p
74.2 FPS
2160p
117.2 FPS
2160p
41.7 FPS
w1440p
169.1 FPS
w1440p
62.0 FPS
i5-10400
  • The i5-10400 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-10400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-10400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-10400 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i5-10400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-540
  • The i3-540 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i5-10400 vs i3-540 specifications

i5-10400 vs i3-540 Architecture

i5-10400 i3-540
CodenameComet LakeClarkdale
GenerationCore i5 (Comet Lake)Core i3 (Clarkdale)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownSLBX7SLBLR
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedMay 2020Jan 2010

i5-10400 vs i3-540 Cache

i5-10400 i3-540
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)4MB (shared)

i5-10400 vs i3-540 Cores

i5-10400 i3-540
# of Cores62
# of Threads124
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 630Intel HD
SMP # CPUs11

i5-10400 vs i3-540 Features

i5-10400 i3-540
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4 SSE4.1 SSE4.2 Intel 64 HTT VT-x XD-Bit

i5-10400 vs i3-540 Notes

i5-10400 i3-540

i5-10400 vs i3-540 Performance

i5-10400 i3-540
Base Clock100 MHz133 MHz
Frequency2.9 GHz3.066 GHz
Multiplier29.0x23.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W73 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.4 V

i5-10400 vs i3-540 Physical

i5-10400 i3-540
Die Sizeunknown81 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA10
Process Size14 nm32 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1156
Transistorsunknown382 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i5-10400 vs i3-540 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments