i3-9320 vs i9-11900K - The Callisto Protocol Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9320 i9-11900K

Multi-Thread Performance

10144 Pts
23993 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2552 Pts
3253 Pts

The Callisto Protocol

i3-9320 vs i9-11900K in The Callisto Protocol using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9320 i9-11900K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
19.5 FPS
1080p
22.6 FPS
1440p
13.9 FPS
1440p
15.8 FPS
2160p
6.9 FPS
2160p
7.9 FPS
w1440p
11.2 FPS
w1440p
12.7 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
38.7 FPS
1080p
44.0 FPS
1440p
28.8 FPS
1440p
32.2 FPS
2160p
15.5 FPS
2160p
17.5 FPS
w1440p
23.8 FPS
w1440p
26.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
57.9 FPS
1080p
65.4 FPS
1440p
43.6 FPS
1440p
48.6 FPS
2160p
24.1 FPS
2160p
27.0 FPS
w1440p
36.4 FPS
w1440p
40.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
96.3 FPS
1080p
108.2 FPS
1440p
73.3 FPS
1440p
81.3 FPS
2160p
41.2 FPS
2160p
46.1 FPS
w1440p
61.5 FPS
w1440p
68.2 FPS
i3-9320
  • The i3-9320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9320 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i9-11900K
  • The i9-11900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i9-11900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-11900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-11900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-11900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i3-9320 vs i9-11900K specifications

i3-9320 vs i9-11900K Architecture

i3-9320 i9-11900K
CodenameCoffee LakeRocket Lake
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Core i9 (Rocket Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#unknownunknown
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedApr 2019Mar 16th, 2021

i3-9320 vs i9-11900K Cache

i3-9320 i9-11900K
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L36MB (shared)16MB (shared)

i3-9320 vs i9-11900K Cores

i3-9320 i9-11900K
# of Cores48
# of Threads416
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630UHD Graphics 750
SMP # CPUs11

i3-9320 vs i9-11900K Performance

i3-9320 i9-11900K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier37.0x35.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP62 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzup to 5.3 GHz
Voltagevariablevariable

i3-9320 vs i9-11900K Physical

i3-9320 i9-11900K
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA1200
Process Size14 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1200
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i3-9320 vs i9-11900K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments