i3-9320 vs Phenom II X3 710 - The Callisto Protocol Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9320 Phenom II X3 710

Multi-Thread Performance

10144 Pts
2442 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2552 Pts
907 Pts

The Callisto Protocol

i3-9320 vs Phenom II X3 710 in The Callisto Protocol using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9320 Phenom II X3 710

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
19.5 FPS
1080p
8.0 FPS
1440p
13.9 FPS
1440p
5.7 FPS
2160p
6.9 FPS
2160p
2.8 FPS
w1440p
11.2 FPS
w1440p
4.5 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
38.7 FPS
1080p
17.7 FPS
1440p
28.8 FPS
1440p
13.1 FPS
2160p
15.5 FPS
2160p
6.9 FPS
w1440p
23.8 FPS
w1440p
10.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
57.9 FPS
1080p
27.3 FPS
1440p
43.6 FPS
1440p
20.4 FPS
2160p
24.1 FPS
2160p
11.0 FPS
w1440p
36.4 FPS
w1440p
16.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
96.3 FPS
1080p
46.6 FPS
1440p
73.3 FPS
1440p
35.2 FPS
2160p
41.2 FPS
2160p
19.3 FPS
w1440p
61.5 FPS
w1440p
28.8 FPS
i3-9320
  • The i3-9320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9320 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Phenom II X3 710
  • The Phenom II X3 710 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Phenom II X3 710 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The Phenom II X3 710 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The Phenom II X3 710 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-9320 vs Phenom II X3 710 specifications

i3-9320 vs Phenom II X3 710 Architecture

i3-9320 Phenom II X3 710
CodenameCoffee LakeHeka
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Phenom II X3 (Heka)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownHDX710WFK3DGIHDX710WFGIBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedApr 2019Feb 2009

i3-9320 vs Phenom II X3 710 Cache

i3-9320 Phenom II X3 710
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L36MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i3-9320 vs Phenom II X3 710 Cores

i3-9320 Phenom II X3 710
# of Cores43
# of Threads43
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-9320 vs Phenom II X3 710 Performance

i3-9320 Phenom II X3 710
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz2.6 GHz
Multiplier37.0x13.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP62 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.425 V

i3-9320 vs Phenom II X3 710 Physical

i3-9320 Phenom II X3 710
Die Sizeunknown258 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1151µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown758 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i3-9320 vs Phenom II X3 710 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments