i3-9320 vs Phenom II X2 545 - The Callisto Protocol Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9320 Phenom II X2 545

Multi-Thread Performance

10144 Pts
1911 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2552 Pts
1025 Pts

The Callisto Protocol

i3-9320 vs Phenom II X2 545 in The Callisto Protocol using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9320 Phenom II X2 545

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
19.5 FPS
1080p
8.3 FPS
1440p
13.9 FPS
1440p
5.9 FPS
2160p
6.9 FPS
2160p
2.9 FPS
w1440p
11.2 FPS
w1440p
4.7 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
38.7 FPS
1080p
18.2 FPS
1440p
28.8 FPS
1440p
13.5 FPS
2160p
15.5 FPS
2160p
7.1 FPS
w1440p
23.8 FPS
w1440p
11.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
57.9 FPS
1080p
28.2 FPS
1440p
43.6 FPS
1440p
21.0 FPS
2160p
24.1 FPS
2160p
11.4 FPS
w1440p
36.4 FPS
w1440p
17.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
96.3 FPS
1080p
48.1 FPS
1440p
73.3 FPS
1440p
36.2 FPS
2160p
41.2 FPS
2160p
19.8 FPS
w1440p
61.5 FPS
w1440p
29.9 FPS
i3-9320
  • The i3-9320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9320 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Phenom II X2 545
  • The Phenom II X2 545 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Phenom II X2 545 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The Phenom II X2 545 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The Phenom II X2 545 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-9320 vs Phenom II X2 545 specifications

i3-9320 vs Phenom II X2 545 Architecture

i3-9320 Phenom II X2 545
CodenameCoffee LakeCallisto
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Phenom II X2 (Callisto)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownHDX545WFK2DGIHDX545WFGIBOXHDX545WFK2DGMHDX545WFGMBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedApr 2019Jun 2009

i3-9320 vs Phenom II X2 545 Cache

i3-9320 Phenom II X2 545
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L36MB (shared)6MB (per core)

i3-9320 vs Phenom II X2 545 Cores

i3-9320 Phenom II X2 545
# of Cores42
# of Threads42
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-9320 vs Phenom II X2 545 Performance

i3-9320 Phenom II X2 545
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier37.0x15.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP62 W80 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.425 V

i3-9320 vs Phenom II X2 545 Physical

i3-9320 Phenom II X2 545
Die Sizeunknown258 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1151µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown758 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i3-9320 vs Phenom II X2 545 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments