i3-8300 vs Athlon II X2 270 - The Callisto Protocol GTX 1650 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-8300 Athlon II X2 270

Multi-Thread Performance

8715 Pts
1985 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2172 Pts
1154 Pts

The Callisto Protocol

i3-8300 vs Athlon II X2 270 in The Callisto Protocol using GTX 1650 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-8300 Athlon II X2 270

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
11.3 FPS
1080p
5.9 FPS
1440p
8.0 FPS
1440p
4.2 FPS
2160p
4.0 FPS
2160p
2.1 FPS
w1440p
6.4 FPS
w1440p
3.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
24.0 FPS
1080p
13.5 FPS
1440p
17.7 FPS
1440p
9.9 FPS
2160p
9.5 FPS
2160p
5.3 FPS
w1440p
14.5 FPS
w1440p
8.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
36.6 FPS
1080p
21.0 FPS
1440p
27.3 FPS
1440p
15.7 FPS
2160p
15.0 FPS
2160p
8.6 FPS
w1440p
22.6 FPS
w1440p
13.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
62.0 FPS
1080p
36.2 FPS
1440p
46.6 FPS
1440p
27.2 FPS
2160p
26.1 FPS
2160p
15.0 FPS
w1440p
38.7 FPS
w1440p
22.7 FPS
i3-8300
  • The i3-8300 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i3-8300 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-8300 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-8300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-8300 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X2 270

    Compare i3-8300 vs Athlon II X2 270 specifications

    i3-8300 vs Athlon II X2 270 Architecture

    i3-8300 Athlon II X2 270
    CodenameCoffee LakeRegor
    GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake)Athlon II X2 (Regor)
    MarketDesktopDesktop
    Memory SupportDDR4DDR2, DDR3
    Part#SR3XYADX270OCK23GM
    Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
    ReleasedFeb 2018Jul 2011

    i3-8300 vs Athlon II X2 270 Cache

    i3-8300 Athlon II X2 270
    Cache L164K (per core)128K
    Cache L2256K (per core)1MB

    i3-8300 vs Athlon II X2 270 Cores

    i3-8300 Athlon II X2 270
    # of Cores42
    # of Threads42
    Integrated GraphicsN/AN/A
    SMP # CPUs11

    i3-8300 vs Athlon II X2 270 Features

    i3-8300 Athlon II X2 270
    MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX 3DNow! SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A AMD64 NX bit AMD-V

    i3-8300 vs Athlon II X2 270 Performance

    i3-8300 Athlon II X2 270
    Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
    Frequency3.7 GHz3.4 GHz
    Multiplier37.0x17.0x
    Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
    TDP62 W65 W
    Turbo ClockN/AN/A
    Voltagevariable1.15 V

    i3-8300 vs Athlon II X2 270 Physical

    i3-8300 Athlon II X2 270
    Die Sizeunknown117 mm²
    PackageFC-LGA1151µPGA
    Process Size14 nm45 nm
    SocketIntel Socket 1151AMD Socket AM3
    Transistorsunknown410 million
    tCaseMax72°Cunknown

    Compare i3-8300 vs Athlon II X2 270 in more games


    Discussion and Comments

    Share Your Comments