i3-7300 vs i9-10900K - The Callisto Protocol Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-7300 i9-10900K

Multi-Thread Performance

6436 Pts
22851 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2317 Pts
3099 Pts

The Callisto Protocol

i3-7300 vs i9-10900K in The Callisto Protocol using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-7300 i9-10900K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
13.1 FPS
1080p
17.4 FPS
1440p
9.3 FPS
1440p
12.3 FPS
2160p
4.7 FPS
2160p
6.2 FPS
w1440p
7.4 FPS
w1440p
9.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
27.3 FPS
1080p
35.0 FPS
1440p
20.2 FPS
1440p
25.8 FPS
2160p
11.0 FPS
2160p
14.1 FPS
w1440p
16.5 FPS
w1440p
21.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
41.5 FPS
1080p
52.6 FPS
1440p
31.1 FPS
1440p
39.3 FPS
2160p
17.3 FPS
2160p
22.0 FPS
w1440p
25.6 FPS
w1440p
32.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
69.9 FPS
1080p
87.9 FPS
1440p
52.8 FPS
1440p
66.4 FPS
2160p
29.9 FPS
2160p
37.7 FPS
w1440p
43.7 FPS
w1440p
55.6 FPS
i3-7300
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-7300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i3-7300 vs i9-10900K specifications

i3-7300 vs i9-10900K Architecture

i3-7300 i9-10900K
CodenameKaby LakeComet Lake
GenerationCore i3 (Kaby Lake)Core i9 (Comet Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#SR359unknown
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedJan 2017May 2020

i3-7300 vs i9-10900K Cache

i3-7300 i9-10900K
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L34MB (shared)16MB (shared)

i3-7300 vs i9-10900K Cores

i3-7300 i9-10900K
# of Cores210
# of Threads420
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 630UHD 630
SMP # CPUs11

i3-7300 vs i9-10900K Features

i3-7300 i9-10900K
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.1 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x HTT AES-NI TSX CLMUL FMA3MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0

i3-7300 vs i9-10900K Performance

i3-7300 i9-10900K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency4 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier40.0x37.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP51 W125 W
Turbo ClockN/Aup to 5.3 GHz
Voltageunknownvariable

i3-7300 vs i9-10900K Physical

i3-7300 i9-10900K
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA1200
Process Size14 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1200
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax65°C72°C

Compare i3-7300 vs i9-10900K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments