i3-12300 vs i5-2500K - The Callisto Protocol Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 i5-2500K

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
6477 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
1897 Pts

The Callisto Protocol

i3-12300 vs i5-2500K in The Callisto Protocol using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 i5-2500K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
16.6 FPS
1080p
11.9 FPS
1440p
11.8 FPS
1440p
8.4 FPS
2160p
5.9 FPS
2160p
4.3 FPS
w1440p
9.5 FPS
w1440p
6.8 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
33.6 FPS
1080p
25.1 FPS
1440p
24.9 FPS
1440p
18.4 FPS
2160p
13.5 FPS
2160p
10.2 FPS
w1440p
20.6 FPS
w1440p
15.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
50.6 FPS
1080p
38.3 FPS
1440p
38.0 FPS
1440p
28.5 FPS
2160p
21.0 FPS
2160p
16.0 FPS
w1440p
31.6 FPS
w1440p
23.8 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
84.6 FPS
1080p
64.6 FPS
1440p
64.2 FPS
1440p
48.5 FPS
2160p
36.2 FPS
2160p
27.7 FPS
w1440p
53.7 FPS
w1440p
40.7 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12300 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12300 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i5-2500K
  • The i5-2500K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-2500K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i3-12300 vs i5-2500K specifications

i3-12300 vs i5-2500K Architecture

i3-12300 i5-2500K
CodenameAlder Lake-SSandy Bridge
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i5 (Sandy Bridge)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRL61SR008
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i3-12300 vs i5-2500K Cache

i3-12300 i5-2500K
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i3-12300 vs i5-2500K Cores

i3-12300 i5-2500K
# of Cores44
# of Threads84
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730Intel HD 3000
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12300 vs i5-2500K Performance

i3-12300 i5-2500K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplier35.0x33.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP60 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzup to 3.7 GHz

i3-12300 vs i5-2500K Physical

i3-12300 i5-2500K
Die Size163 mm²216 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA10
Process Size10 nm32 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1155

Compare i3-12300 vs i5-2500K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments