i3-12100 vs Ryzen 5 2600 - The Callisto Protocol Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 Ryzen 5 2600

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
13503 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
2008 Pts

The Callisto Protocol

i3-12100 vs Ryzen 5 2600 in The Callisto Protocol using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 Ryzen 5 2600

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
20.8 FPS
1080p
17.4 FPS
1440p
14.8 FPS
1440p
12.4 FPS
2160p
7.4 FPS
2160p
6.2 FPS
w1440p
11.9 FPS
w1440p
9.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
40.9 FPS
1080p
35.0 FPS
1440p
30.4 FPS
1440p
26.0 FPS
2160p
16.5 FPS
2160p
14.1 FPS
w1440p
25.1 FPS
w1440p
21.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
61.1 FPS
1080p
52.6 FPS
1440p
46.0 FPS
1440p
39.6 FPS
2160p
25.6 FPS
2160p
22.0 FPS
w1440p
38.3 FPS
w1440p
32.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
101.4 FPS
1080p
87.9 FPS
1440p
77.2 FPS
1440p
66.8 FPS
2160p
43.7 FPS
2160p
37.7 FPS
w1440p
64.6 FPS
w1440p
55.6 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Ryzen 5 2600
  • The Ryzen 5 2600 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Ryzen 5 2600 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The Ryzen 5 2600 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The Ryzen 5 2600 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The Ryzen 5 2600 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i3-12100 vs Ryzen 5 2600 specifications

i3-12100 vs Ryzen 5 2600 Architecture

i3-12100 Ryzen 5 2600
CodenameAlder Lake-SZen
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Ryzen 5 (Zen+ (Pinnacle Ridge))
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRL62YD2600BBM6IAF
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-12100 vs Ryzen 5 2600 Cache

i3-12100 Ryzen 5 2600
Cache L180K (per core)96K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)16MB (shared)

i3-12100 vs Ryzen 5 2600 Cores

i3-12100 Ryzen 5 2600
# of Cores46
# of Threads812
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12100 vs Ryzen 5 2600 Performance

i3-12100 Ryzen 5 2600
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.3 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier33.0x34.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP60 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzup to 3.9 GHz

i3-12100 vs Ryzen 5 2600 Physical

i3-12100 Ryzen 5 2600
Die Size163 mm²192 mm²
FoundryIntelGlobalFoundries
PackageFC-LGA16AµOPGA-1331
Process Size10 nm12 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM4

Compare i3-12100 vs Ryzen 5 2600 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments