i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 265 - The Callisto Protocol GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 Athlon II X2 265

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
1890 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
1117 Pts

The Callisto Protocol

i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 265 in The Callisto Protocol using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 Athlon II X2 265

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
15.3 FPS
1080p
6.8 FPS
1440p
10.9 FPS
1440p
4.8 FPS
2160p
5.4 FPS
2160p
2.4 FPS
w1440p
8.7 FPS
w1440p
3.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
31.3 FPS
1080p
15.3 FPS
1440p
23.2 FPS
1440p
11.2 FPS
2160p
12.4 FPS
2160p
6.0 FPS
w1440p
19.0 FPS
w1440p
9.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
47.3 FPS
1080p
23.8 FPS
1440p
35.5 FPS
1440p
17.6 FPS
2160p
19.5 FPS
2160p
9.6 FPS
w1440p
29.3 FPS
w1440p
14.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
79.3 FPS
1080p
40.7 FPS
1440p
60.2 FPS
1440p
30.4 FPS
2160p
33.6 FPS
2160p
16.9 FPS
w1440p
50.0 FPS
w1440p
25.5 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i3-12100 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12100 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X2 265

    Compare i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 265 specifications

    i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 265 Architecture

    i3-12100 Athlon II X2 265
    CodenameAlder Lake-SRegor
    GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Athlon II X2 (Regor)
    MarketDesktopDesktop
    Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR2, DDR3
    Part#SRL62ADX265OCK23GM
    Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

    i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 265 Cache

    i3-12100 Athlon II X2 265
    Cache L180K (per core)128K
    Cache L21.25MB (per core)1MB

    i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 265 Cores

    i3-12100 Athlon II X2 265
    # of Cores42
    # of Threads82
    Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
    SMP # CPUs11

    i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 265 Performance

    i3-12100 Athlon II X2 265
    Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
    Frequency3.3 GHz3.3 GHz
    Multiplier33.0x16.5x
    Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
    TDP60 W65 W
    Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzN/A

    i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 265 Physical

    i3-12100 Athlon II X2 265
    Die Size163 mm²117 mm²
    PackageFC-LGA16AµPGA
    Process Size10 nm45 nm
    SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3

    Compare i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 265 in more games


    Discussion and Comments

    Share Your Comments