i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 260 - The Callisto Protocol Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 Athlon II X2 260

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
1873 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
1074 Pts

The Callisto Protocol

i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 260 in The Callisto Protocol using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 Athlon II X2 260

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
20.8 FPS
1080p
8.6 FPS
1440p
14.8 FPS
1440p
6.1 FPS
2160p
7.4 FPS
2160p
3.1 FPS
w1440p
11.9 FPS
w1440p
4.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
40.9 FPS
1080p
18.8 FPS
1440p
30.4 FPS
1440p
13.9 FPS
2160p
16.5 FPS
2160p
7.6 FPS
w1440p
25.1 FPS
w1440p
11.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
61.1 FPS
1080p
29.1 FPS
1440p
46.0 FPS
1440p
21.7 FPS
2160p
25.6 FPS
2160p
12.1 FPS
w1440p
38.3 FPS
w1440p
17.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
101.4 FPS
1080p
49.5 FPS
1440p
77.2 FPS
1440p
37.2 FPS
2160p
43.7 FPS
2160p
21.0 FPS
w1440p
64.6 FPS
w1440p
31.0 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i3-12100 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12100 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X2 260

    Compare i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 260 specifications

    i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 260 Architecture

    i3-12100 Athlon II X2 260
    CodenameAlder Lake-SRegor
    GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Athlon II X2 (Regor)
    MarketDesktopDesktop
    Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
    Part#SRL62ADX260OCK23GM
    Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

    i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 260 Cache

    i3-12100 Athlon II X2 260
    Cache L180K (per core)128K
    Cache L21.25MB (per core)1MB

    i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 260 Cores

    i3-12100 Athlon II X2 260
    # of Cores42
    # of Threads82
    Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
    SMP # CPUs11

    i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 260 Performance

    i3-12100 Athlon II X2 260
    Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
    Frequency3.3 GHz3.2 GHz
    Multiplier33.0x16.0x
    Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
    TDP60 W65 W
    Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzN/A

    i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 260 Physical

    i3-12100 Athlon II X2 260
    Die Size163 mm²117 mm²
    PackageFC-LGA16AµPGA
    Process Size10 nm45 nm
    SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3

    Compare i3-12100 vs Athlon II X2 260 in more games


    Discussion and Comments

    Share Your Comments