Phenom II X3 705e vs i3-12100 - The Callisto Protocol GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


Phenom II X3 705e i3-12100

Multi-Thread Performance

2227 Pts
12603 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

844 Pts
3340 Pts

The Callisto Protocol

Phenom II X3 705e vs i3-12100 in The Callisto Protocol using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

Phenom II X3 705e i3-12100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
5.1 FPS
1080p
15.3 FPS
1440p
3.7 FPS
1440p
10.9 FPS
2160p
1.8 FPS
2160p
5.4 FPS
w1440p
2.9 FPS
w1440p
8.7 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
11.8 FPS
1080p
31.3 FPS
1440p
8.9 FPS
1440p
23.2 FPS
2160p
4.6 FPS
2160p
12.4 FPS
w1440p
7.1 FPS
w1440p
19.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
18.6 FPS
1080p
47.3 FPS
1440p
14.1 FPS
1440p
35.5 FPS
2160p
7.5 FPS
2160p
19.5 FPS
w1440p
11.4 FPS
w1440p
29.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
32.0 FPS
1080p
79.3 FPS
1440p
24.4 FPS
1440p
60.2 FPS
2160p
13.2 FPS
2160p
33.6 FPS
w1440p
19.8 FPS
w1440p
50.0 FPS
Phenom II X3 705e
  • The Phenom II X3 705e has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12100 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12100 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare Phenom II X3 705e vs i3-12100 specifications

Phenom II X3 705e vs i3-12100 Architecture

Phenom II X3 705e i3-12100
CodenameHekaAlder Lake-S
GenerationPhenom II X3 (Heka)Core i3 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR3DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Part#HD705EOCK3DGIHD705EOCGIBOXSRL62
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive

Phenom II X3 705e vs i3-12100 Cache

Phenom II X3 705e i3-12100
Cache L1128K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L2512K (per core)1.25MB (per core)
Cache L36MB (shared)12MB (shared)

Phenom II X3 705e vs i3-12100 Cores

Phenom II X3 705e i3-12100
# of Cores34
# of Threads38
Integrated GraphicsN/AUHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

Phenom II X3 705e vs i3-12100 Features

Phenom II X3 705e i3-12100

Phenom II X3 705e vs i3-12100 Performance

Phenom II X3 705e i3-12100
Base Clock200 MHz100 MHz
Frequency2.5 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplier12.5x33.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W60 W
Turbo ClockN/Aup to 4.3 GHz

Phenom II X3 705e vs i3-12100 Physical

Phenom II X3 705e i3-12100
Die Size258 mm²163 mm²
PackageµPGAFC-LGA16A
Process Size45 nm10 nm
SocketAMD Socket AM3Intel Socket 1700

Compare Phenom II X3 705e vs i3-12100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments