Athlon II X2 215 vs i5-9400F - The Callisto Protocol RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB - Game Performance Benchmarks


Athlon II X2 215 i5-9400F

Multi-Thread Performance

1578 Pts
12212 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

908 Pts
2387 Pts

The Callisto Protocol

Athlon II X2 215 vs i5-9400F in The Callisto Protocol using RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

Athlon II X2 215 i5-9400F

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
6.9 FPS
1080p
19.4 FPS
1440p
4.9 FPS
1440p
13.9 FPS
2160p
2.5 FPS
2160p
6.9 FPS
w1440p
4.0 FPS
w1440p
11.2 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
15.5 FPS
1080p
38.5 FPS
1440p
11.4 FPS
1440p
28.8 FPS
2160p
6.2 FPS
2160p
15.5 FPS
w1440p
9.5 FPS
w1440p
23.8 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
24.1 FPS
1080p
57.6 FPS
1440p
17.9 FPS
1440p
43.6 FPS
2160p
10.0 FPS
2160p
24.1 FPS
w1440p
15.0 FPS
w1440p
36.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
41.2 FPS
1080p
95.9 FPS
1440p
31.0 FPS
1440p
73.3 FPS
2160p
17.5 FPS
2160p
41.2 FPS
w1440p
26.1 FPS
w1440p
61.5 FPS
Athlon II X2 215
  • The Athlon II X2 215 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
i5-9400F
  • The i5-9400F has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-9400F has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-9400F has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i5-9400F has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare Athlon II X2 215 vs i5-9400F specifications

Athlon II X2 215 vs i5-9400F Architecture

Athlon II X2 215 i5-9400F
CodenameRegorCoffee Lake
GenerationAthlon II X2 (Regor)Core i5 (Coffee Lake Refresh)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR3DDR4
Part#ADX215OCK22GQSRF6M
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ReleasedOct 2009Jan 2019

Athlon II X2 215 vs i5-9400F Cache

Athlon II X2 215 i5-9400F
Cache L1128K64K (per core)
Cache L2512K256K (per core)

Athlon II X2 215 vs i5-9400F Cores

Athlon II X2 215 i5-9400F
# of Cores26
# of Threads26
Integrated GraphicsN/AN/A
SMP # CPUs11

Athlon II X2 215 vs i5-9400F Features

Athlon II X2 215 i5-9400F
MMX 3DNow! SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A AMD64 NX bit AMD-VMMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0

Athlon II X2 215 vs i5-9400F Performance

Athlon II X2 215 i5-9400F
Base Clock200 MHz100 MHz
Frequency2.7 GHz2.9 GHz
Multiplier13.5x29.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W65 W
Turbo ClockN/Aup to 4.1 GHz
Voltage1.15 Vvariable

Athlon II X2 215 vs i5-9400F Physical

Athlon II X2 215 i5-9400F
Die Size117 mm²unknown
PackageµPGAFC-LGA1151
Process Size45 nm14 nm
SocketAMD Socket AM3Intel Socket 1151
Transistors410 millionunknown
tCaseMaxunknown72°C

Compare Athlon II X2 215 vs i5-9400F in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments