i9-10900K vs i3-10100 - Starfield RX 6550S - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
2531 Pts

Starfield

i9-10900K vs i3-10100 in Starfield using RX 6550S - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
17.4 FPS
1080p
15.7 FPS
1440p
15.6 FPS
1440p
14.1 FPS
2160p
10.4 FPS
2160p
9.4 FPS
w1440p
13.9 FPS
w1440p
12.5 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
35.0 FPS
1080p
32.0 FPS
1440p
31.8 FPS
1440p
29.1 FPS
2160p
22.3 FPS
2160p
20.4 FPS
w1440p
28.8 FPS
w1440p
26.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
52.6 FPS
1080p
48.3 FPS
1440p
48.1 FPS
1440p
44.1 FPS
2160p
34.1 FPS
2160p
31.3 FPS
w1440p
43.6 FPS
w1440p
39.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
87.9 FPS
1080p
80.9 FPS
1440p
80.5 FPS
1440p
74.2 FPS
2160p
57.9 FPS
2160p
53.3 FPS
w1440p
73.3 FPS
w1440p
67.3 FPS
i9-10900K
    i3-10100
    • The i3-10100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

    Compare i9-10900K vs i3-10100 specifications

    i9-10900K vs i3-10100 Architecture

    i9-10900K i3-10100

    i9-10900K vs i3-10100 Cache

    i9-10900K i3-10100

    i9-10900K vs i3-10100 Cores

    i9-10900K i3-10100

    i9-10900K vs i3-10100 Features

    i9-10900K i3-10100

    i9-10900K vs i3-10100 Notes

    i9-10900K i3-10100

    i9-10900K vs i3-10100 Performance

    i9-10900K i3-10100
    Frequency3.7 GHz3.60 GHz
    TDP125 W65 W

    i9-10900K vs i3-10100 Physical

    i9-10900K i3-10100

    Compare i9-10900K vs i3-10100 in more games


    Discussion and Comments

    Share Your Comments