i9-10900K vs i3-12300 - Resident Evil 4 RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K i3-12300

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
14493 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
3550 Pts

Resident Evil 4

i9-10900K vs i3-12300 in Resident Evil 4 using RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K i3-12300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
137.7 FPS
1080p
131.7 FPS
1440p
100.1 FPS
1440p
95.8 FPS
2160p
75.1 FPS
2160p
71.8 FPS
w1440p
93.7 FPS
w1440p
89.7 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
206.0 FPS
1080p
198.4 FPS
1440p
157.7 FPS
1440p
152.0 FPS
2160p
123.7 FPS
2160p
119.1 FPS
w1440p
149.2 FPS
w1440p
143.8 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
274.2 FPS
1080p
265.2 FPS
1440p
215.3 FPS
1440p
208.1 FPS
2160p
172.3 FPS
2160p
166.4 FPS
w1440p
204.6 FPS
w1440p
197.8 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
410.7 FPS
1080p
398.7 FPS
1440p
330.5 FPS
1440p
320.5 FPS
2160p
269.5 FPS
2160p
260.9 FPS
w1440p
315.5 FPS
w1440p
306.0 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12300 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i9-10900K vs i3-12300 specifications

i9-10900K vs i3-12300 Architecture

i9-10900K i3-12300
CodenameComet LakeAlder Lake-S
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Core i3 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Part#unknownSRL61
Production StatusActiveActive

i9-10900K vs i3-12300 Cache

i9-10900K i3-12300
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)1.25MB (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)12MB (shared)

i9-10900K vs i3-12300 Cores

i9-10900K i3-12300
# of Cores104
# of Threads208
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630UHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs i3-12300 Features

i9-10900K i3-12300

i9-10900K vs i3-12300 Notes

i9-10900K i3-12300

i9-10900K vs i3-12300 Performance

i9-10900K i3-12300
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier37.0x35.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W60 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzup to 4.4 GHz

i9-10900K vs i3-12300 Physical

i9-10900K i3-12300
Die Sizeunknown163 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1700

Compare i9-10900K vs i3-12300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments