Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Phenom X3 8550 - Rainbow Six Siege R9 290X - Game Performance Benchmarks


Core2 Quad Q9550 Phenom X3 8550

Multi-Thread Performance

3974 Pts
1930 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

1196 Pts
741 Pts

Rainbow Six Siege

Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Phenom X3 8550 in Rainbow Six Siege using R9 290X - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

Core2 Quad Q9550 Phenom X3 8550

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
75.8 FPS
1080p
55.9 FPS
1440p
49.0 FPS
1440p
36.2 FPS
2160p
22.8 FPS
2160p
16.8 FPS
w1440p
38.4 FPS
w1440p
28.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
124.7 FPS
1080p
96.2 FPS
1440p
85.9 FPS
1440p
66.2 FPS
2160p
44.4 FPS
2160p
34.0 FPS
w1440p
69.7 FPS
w1440p
53.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
173.6 FPS
1080p
136.5 FPS
1440p
122.9 FPS
1440p
96.3 FPS
2160p
65.9 FPS
2160p
51.1 FPS
w1440p
101.0 FPS
w1440p
78.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
271.3 FPS
1080p
217.1 FPS
1440p
196.8 FPS
1440p
156.3 FPS
2160p
109.0 FPS
2160p
85.5 FPS
w1440p
163.6 FPS
w1440p
129.2 FPS
Core2 Quad Q9550
  • The Core2 Quad Q9550 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The Core2 Quad Q9550 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The Core2 Quad Q9550 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Phenom X3 8550
  • The Phenom X3 8550 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Phenom X3 8550 specifications

Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Phenom X3 8550 Architecture

Core2 Quad Q9550 Phenom X3 8550
CodenameYorkfieldToliman
GenerationCore 2 Quad (Yorkfield)Phenom X3 (Toliman)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR1, DDR2, DDR3unknown
Part#SLAWQSLB8VHD8550WCJ3BGH
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ReleasedMar 2008Apr 2008

Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Phenom X3 8550 Cache

Core2 Quad Q9550 Phenom X3 8550
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L212MB (shared)512K (per core)

Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Phenom X3 8550 Cores

Core2 Quad Q9550 Phenom X3 8550
# of Cores43
# of Threads43
Integrated GraphicsN/AN/A
SMP # CPUs11

Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Phenom X3 8550 Features

Core2 Quad Q9550 Phenom X3 8550
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4.1 EIST Intel 64 iAMT2 VT-x TXTMMX 3DNow! SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A AMD64 NX bit CnQ AMD-V HT3.0

Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Phenom X3 8550 Notes

Core2 Quad Q9550 Phenom X3 8550

Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Phenom X3 8550 Performance

Core2 Quad Q9550 Phenom X3 8550
Base Clock333 MHz200 MHz
Frequency2.833 GHz2.2 GHz
Multiplier8.5x11.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP95 W95 W
Turbo ClockN/AN/A
Voltage1.11 V1.25 V

Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Phenom X3 8550 Physical

Core2 Quad Q9550 Phenom X3 8550
Die Size2x 107 mm²285 mm²
PackageFC-LGA6µPGA
Process Size45 nm65 nm
SocketIntel Socket 775AMD Socket AM2+
Transistors820 million450 million
tCaseMax71°Cunknown

Compare Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Phenom X3 8550 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments
P
primppicalo 9 years ago
Upgrading Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550I only have $175AUD ($135USD) and I'm a huge fan of video editing. I mainly use vegas pro and after fx but i love a little bit of counter strike global offensive in between. My q9550 is quite slow in pre-rendering and rendering projects and I'm using money I've gathered to upgrade. I cannot go over my budget because i simply don't have the money to spend Is the fx6300 a good option or is there something better i could get within my price range? I'm currently using a GTX 650 ti (old i know ahah) but am hopefully getting a GTX msi 950 2gb gaming edition for christmas this year. I have 12 gigs ram, and motherboard will be decided when I find a suitable cpuThanks Ryan
0 0
B
bogeycycle 9 years ago
When it comes to video editing, it is recommended to use an i7 Processor at minimum, but as you are on a limited budget, then that cannot happen (Unless you wait longer) and you'll need to get a new motherboard as well, as the LGA775 isn't widely used anymore. And to get a decent AMD CPU, or Intel CPU, that will allow somewhat alright rendering, it would be much over your budget.For example:PCPartPicker part list: http://au.pcpartpicker.com/list/Z8TBmGPrice breakdown by merchant: http://au.pcpartpicker.com/list/Z8TBmG/by_merchant/CPU: AMD FX-6300 3.5GHz 6-Core Processor ($153.00 @ Centre Com) Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 Micro ATX AM3+ Motherboard ($89.00 @ Umart) Total: $242.00Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when availableGenerated by PCPartPicker 2016-09-08 20:06 AEST+1000Or PCPartPicker part list: http://au.pcpartpicker.com/list/QrXNWZPrice breakdown by merchant: http://au.pcpartpicker.com/list/QrXNWZ/by_merchant/CPU: AMD A8-7600 3.1GHz Quad-Core Processor ($106.99 @ Mwave Australia) Motherboard: MSI A58M-E35 Micro ATX FM2+ Motherboard ($69.00 @ CPL Online) Total: $175.99Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when availableGenerated by PCPartPicker 2016-09-08 20:08 AEST+1000No promises on these being good, but they will be good to play games, but they will be slower when rendering, and may be a little unstable. But you wont be able to get a decent CPU for that price that will render flawlessly.You could always get an i3 with Hyperthreading:PCPartPicker part list: http://au.pcpartpicker.com/list/yznhFTPrice breakdown by merchant: http://au.pcpartpicker.com/list/yznhFT/by_merchant/CPU: Intel Core i3-4160 3.6GHz Dual-Core Processor ($109.00 @ Storm Computers) Motherboard: ASRock H81M-HDS Micro ATX LGA1150 Motherboard ($68.00 @ CPL Online) Total: $177.00Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when availableGenerated by PCPartPicker 2016-09-08 20:09 AEST+1000This would probably be much more stable, and it is a really good, cheap Intel CPU.
0 0
C
craftyking 11 years ago
CPU not overclocking (Core 2 Quad Q9550)I am trying to overclock my Intel core 2 quad q9550 cpu from 2.8 to 3.4 GHz but im failing at it.I have read many guides and what not and also the overclocking manual of the cpu but every time i try to overclock my computer reboots and goes back to default clock speed. I have also tried diffrent clock speeds and voltages for my cpu but the same thing happens. Any ideas what to do?
0 0
R
rowdyerring 11 years ago
Oh well, that motherboard will be pretty bad for overclocking that chip. Look at trying to overclock to 350Mhz fsb my exerience with a similar board a g31-es2l which had fsb limits of around 360Mhz and the two boards are virtually the same excet for ram support. This really sucks for you due to the chip already running a default fsb of 333Mhz.
0 0
G
grublunchbox 11 years ago
need help: core 2 quad q9550 OCsup quays??i want to overclock my cpu from 2.83to 3.40 i need the best bios option especially the cpu and ram vcoreand i would to know witch option should change??and what about the pcie??my motherboard: gigabyte ep45-ds4pi have : 8gb ram 4 peices
0 0
S
silverbasil 11 years ago
Older CPUs are OCd only by altering the BUS. So, the first option in BIOS is to desable "Spread spectrum" so it wont affect the other components. RAM speed is going to be affectet alltough... so, you need to play with the ram ratio aswell (lower it). Then start increasing the bus, i say untill you get 3,2 GHz, run stress tests, monitor temps etc, then rais a bit more to 3,3 - 3,4. Dont alter the core voltage, i think you are fine with default.
0 0
L
lyricsdata 10 years ago
Good Core 2 Quad Q9550 Upgrade?Okay, so I have asked this question about 1 year ago but I haven't upgraded since then. This is the year I am positive about upgrading from my Q9550 as their are bottlenecks in games. Frames drop from 50 to 20 or 30. I gave a GTX 760 @ 2GB and it's a good GPU but my CPU is bringing it down. I have been thinking about this upgrade for a year now and I was positive to upgrade to core i5/i7 but somehow my mind changed and I suddenly want to upgrade to FX-8350. I know it's late and it's been 2.5 years since launch but it seems like bang for my buck. Will I notice any differences between the FX-8350 and my Q9550? Will it be a good upgrade? Or is the Intel core i5 4690k/i7 4790k much better and worth the extra $50-100. BTW, I live in Canada so prices here are higher and deals are much lower. The i7-4790k is $400 while the i5 is $300. Tax in ontario is %13 so it adds up. Is that $100-$200 Intel more worth it than the FX or not? No budget, just want to know if the FX is worth it and the extra money for Intel isn't.
0 0
F
flyablepursuable 10 years ago
I'd agree with InvalidError, either will be a performance improvement but the i5 would be better than the 8350. As far as prices being higher in canada they're really not when you factor the conversion rate. For instance a 4690k is listed as $270 canadian dollars, or $222 usd. It balances out. I'm not certain of tax but even the highest end i5 right now is $270 free shipping from newegg canada. Not sure where you're planning to buy it for $300. The 8350 is $210 from ncixus so it's a $60 canadian difference ($50 usd difference) not $200.It's up to you whether you think it's worth it or not. With skylake coming up toward the end of the year it may be worthwhile waiting for it. Even amd is supposed to have something early 2016 rather than buying into an amd platform that hasn't changed much the past 4yrs. You'd be buying into the tail end of it on it's way out going to the 8350 now. Skylake is rumored to have possibly ddr3 and ddr4 compatibility. Unless you're using ddr3 now (most likely ddr2) if you have to upgrade your ram anyway it may be worth skipping ddr3 at this point and going with ddr4 so you're not buying into ram that's starting to be fazed out.I went with the i5 as well and have been really happy with it coming from a core 2 duo. I also made the transition 5mo ago though, had I waited til now I might have just waited for skylake. Even going with the current i5 I'm sure it'll last me a good 4yrs or more. My e8400 lasted me a good 6yrs.
0 0
T
tungadalsepia 9 years ago
Overclocking Failed !Greetings everyone,Im trying to overclock my Q9550 with google's help since i don't know how to do itand something is failing my overclock i believe its either that my ram is getting overclocked to high or my voltages are to low and i dont know how to either properly increase volts or stop clocking my ram seperate by my cpu here are some picsMobo: p5kpl/1600RAM: 667hzI would really appreciate any help
0 0
T
togetherpetite 9 years ago
If you set your ram to 667 speed manually it shouldn't scale like that.
0 0