i9-10900K vs i7-4790K - Project CARS 2 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K i7-4790K

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
11183 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
2530 Pts

Project CARS 2

i9-10900K vs i7-4790K in Project CARS 2 using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K i7-4790K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
54.4 FPS
1080p
49.1 FPS
1440p
38.2 FPS
1440p
34.5 FPS
2160p
31.6 FPS
2160p
28.5 FPS
w1440p
37.3 FPS
w1440p
33.7 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
94.0 FPS
1080p
86.1 FPS
1440p
69.4 FPS
1440p
63.5 FPS
2160p
58.9 FPS
2160p
53.8 FPS
w1440p
68.0 FPS
w1440p
62.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
133.6 FPS
1080p
123.1 FPS
1440p
100.6 FPS
1440p
92.6 FPS
2160p
86.2 FPS
2160p
79.2 FPS
w1440p
98.6 FPS
w1440p
90.8 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
212.8 FPS
1080p
197.1 FPS
1440p
162.9 FPS
1440p
150.7 FPS
2160p
140.8 FPS
2160p
129.9 FPS
w1440p
160.0 FPS
w1440p
148.0 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i9-10900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i7-4790K
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i7-4790K is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i9-10900K vs i7-4790K specifications

i9-10900K vs i7-4790K Architecture

i9-10900K i7-4790K
CodenameComet LakeHaswell
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Core i7 (Haswell)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownunknown
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedMay 2020May 2014

i9-10900K vs i7-4790K Cache

i9-10900K i7-4790K
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)8MB (shared)

i9-10900K vs i7-4790K Cores

i9-10900K i7-4790K
# of Cores104
# of Threads208
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630Intel HD 4600
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs i7-4790K Features

i9-10900K i7-4790K
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0

i9-10900K vs i7-4790K Notes

i9-10900K i7-4790K

i9-10900K vs i7-4790K Performance

i9-10900K i7-4790K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz4 GHz
Multiplier37.0x40.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W88 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzup to 4.4 GHz
Voltagevariableunknown

i9-10900K vs i7-4790K Physical

i9-10900K i7-4790K
Die Sizeunknown177 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200
Process Size14 nm22 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1150
Transistorsunknown1400 million
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i9-10900K vs i7-4790K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments