i9-10900K vs Athlon II X4 640 - Project CARS 2 RTX 4050 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K Athlon II X4 640

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
3315 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
1025 Pts

Project CARS 2

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X4 640 in Project CARS 2 using RTX 4050 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K Athlon II X4 640

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
97.3 FPS
1080p
40.9 FPS
1440p
67.9 FPS
1440p
28.6 FPS
2160p
56.7 FPS
2160p
23.9 FPS
w1440p
66.7 FPS
w1440p
28.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
154.0 FPS
1080p
73.6 FPS
1440p
113.6 FPS
1440p
54.0 FPS
2160p
97.4 FPS
2160p
46.2 FPS
w1440p
111.8 FPS
w1440p
53.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
210.7 FPS
1080p
106.3 FPS
1440p
159.2 FPS
1440p
79.4 FPS
2160p
138.1 FPS
2160p
68.5 FPS
w1440p
157.0 FPS
w1440p
78.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
324.0 FPS
1080p
171.6 FPS
1440p
250.5 FPS
1440p
130.3 FPS
2160p
219.4 FPS
2160p
113.1 FPS
w1440p
247.3 FPS
w1440p
128.1 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i9-10900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X4 640
  • The Athlon II X4 640 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i9-10900K vs Athlon II X4 640 specifications

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X4 640 Architecture

i9-10900K Athlon II X4 640
CodenameComet LakePropus
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Athlon II X4 (Propus)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownADX640WFK42GMADX640WFGMBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedMay 2020May 2010

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X4 640 Cache

i9-10900K Athlon II X4 640
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X4 640 Cores

i9-10900K Athlon II X4 640
# of Cores104
# of Threads204
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X4 640 Features

i9-10900K Athlon II X4 640
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX 3DNow! SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A AMD64 NX bit AMD-V

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X4 640 Notes

i9-10900K Athlon II X4 640

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X4 640 Performance

i9-10900K Athlon II X4 640
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier37.0x15.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.4 V

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X4 640 Physical

i9-10900K Athlon II X4 640
Die Sizeunknown169 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1200µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown300 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i9-10900K vs Athlon II X4 640 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments