i9-10900K vs Athlon II X2 220 - PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds RTX 2050 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K Athlon II X2 220

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
1634 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
933 Pts

PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X2 220 in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds using RTX 2050 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K Athlon II X2 220

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
55.6 FPS
1080p
18.5 FPS
1440p
40.4 FPS
1440p
13.5 FPS
2160p
23.2 FPS
2160p
7.7 FPS
w1440p
34.0 FPS
w1440p
11.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
95.8 FPS
1080p
37.0 FPS
1440p
72.8 FPS
1440p
28.0 FPS
2160p
45.0 FPS
2160p
17.1 FPS
w1440p
62.7 FPS
w1440p
24.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
135.9 FPS
1080p
55.4 FPS
1440p
105.2 FPS
1440p
42.6 FPS
2160p
66.9 FPS
2160p
26.4 FPS
w1440p
91.5 FPS
w1440p
36.6 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
216.3 FPS
1080p
92.3 FPS
1440p
170.0 FPS
1440p
71.6 FPS
2160p
110.5 FPS
2160p
45.2 FPS
w1440p
149.0 FPS
w1440p
62.0 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i9-10900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X2 220
  • The Athlon II X2 220 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Athlon II X2 220 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i9-10900K vs Athlon II X2 220 specifications

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X2 220 Architecture

i9-10900K Athlon II X2 220
CodenameComet LakeRegor
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Athlon II X2 (Regor)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownADX220OCK22GM
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedMay 2020Sep 2010

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X2 220 Cache

i9-10900K Athlon II X2 220
Cache L164K (per core)128K
Cache L2256K (per core)512K

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X2 220 Cores

i9-10900K Athlon II X2 220
# of Cores102
# of Threads202
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X2 220 Features

i9-10900K Athlon II X2 220
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX 3DNow! SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A AMD64 NX bit AMD-V

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X2 220 Notes

i9-10900K Athlon II X2 220

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X2 220 Performance

i9-10900K Athlon II X2 220
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz2.8 GHz
Multiplier37.0x14.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.15 V

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X2 220 Physical

i9-10900K Athlon II X2 220
Die Sizeunknown117 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1200µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown410 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i9-10900K vs Athlon II X2 220 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments