i9-13900K vs i3-10100 - Need For Speed GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-13900K i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

34549 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

4683 Pts
2531 Pts

Need For Speed

i9-13900K vs i3-10100 in Need For Speed using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-13900K i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
67.5 FPS
1080p
56.3 FPS
1440p
49.4 FPS
1440p
43.1 FPS
2160p
32.6 FPS
2160p
28.5 FPS
w1440p
43.9 FPS
w1440p
38.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
113.0 FPS
1080p
96.8 FPS
1440p
86.5 FPS
1440p
77.0 FPS
2160p
60.5 FPS
2160p
53.8 FPS
w1440p
78.2 FPS
w1440p
69.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
158.5 FPS
1080p
137.3 FPS
1440p
123.7 FPS
1440p
110.9 FPS
2160p
88.4 FPS
2160p
79.2 FPS
w1440p
112.5 FPS
w1440p
100.8 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
249.5 FPS
1080p
218.3 FPS
1440p
198.0 FPS
1440p
178.6 FPS
2160p
144.2 FPS
2160p
129.9 FPS
w1440p
181.1 FPS
w1440p
163.2 FPS
i9-13900K
    i3-10100
    • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
    • The i3-10100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

    Compare i9-13900K vs i3-10100 specifications

    i9-13900K vs i3-10100 Architecture

    i9-13900K i3-10100

    i9-13900K vs i3-10100 Cache

    i9-13900K i3-10100

    i9-13900K vs i3-10100 Cores

    i9-13900K i3-10100

    i9-13900K vs i3-10100 Performance

    i9-13900K i3-10100
    Frequency3 GHz3.60 GHz
    TDP125 W65 W

    i9-13900K vs i3-10100 Physical

    i9-13900K i3-10100

    Compare i9-13900K vs i3-10100 in more games


    Discussion and Comments

    Share Your Comments