i7-10700K vs i9-14900K - Need For Speed GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i7-10700K i9-14900K

Multi-Thread Performance

18919 Pts
41458 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2991 Pts
5619 Pts

Need For Speed

i7-10700K vs i9-14900K in Need For Speed using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i7-10700K i9-14900K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
61.9 FPS
1080p
68.0 FPS
1440p
47.4 FPS
1440p
49.5 FPS
2160p
31.4 FPS
2160p
32.7 FPS
w1440p
42.2 FPS
w1440p
44.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
105.0 FPS
1080p
113.7 FPS
1440p
83.5 FPS
1440p
86.7 FPS
2160p
58.6 FPS
2160p
60.7 FPS
w1440p
75.6 FPS
w1440p
78.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
148.0 FPS
1080p
159.4 FPS
1440p
119.7 FPS
1440p
123.9 FPS
2160p
85.7 FPS
2160p
88.6 FPS
w1440p
109.0 FPS
w1440p
112.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
234.1 FPS
1080p
250.8 FPS
1440p
191.9 FPS
1440p
198.3 FPS
2160p
140.1 FPS
2160p
144.5 FPS
w1440p
175.8 FPS
w1440p
181.4 FPS
i7-10700K
  • The i7-10700K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i7-10700K is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i7-10700K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i9-14900K
  • The i9-14900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-14900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i7-10700K vs i9-14900K specifications

i7-10700K vs i9-14900K Architecture

i7-10700K i9-14900K
CodenameComet LakeRaptor Lake-R
GenerationCore i7 (Comet Lake)Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5

i7-10700K vs i9-14900K Cache

i7-10700K i9-14900K
Cache L164K (per core)80 KB (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)2 MB (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)36 MB (shared)

i7-10700K vs i9-14900K Cores

i7-10700K i9-14900K

i7-10700K vs i9-14900K Features

i7-10700K i9-14900K

i7-10700K vs i9-14900K Notes

i7-10700K i9-14900K

i7-10700K vs i9-14900K Performance

i7-10700K i9-14900K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.8 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier38.0x32.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesYes
TDP125 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.1 GHzup to 6 GHz

i7-10700K vs i9-14900K Physical

i7-10700K i9-14900K
Die Sizeunknown257 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1700

Compare i7-10700K vs i9-14900K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments