i3-9320 vs i5-7600 - Need For Speed Graphics 448SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9320 i5-7600

Multi-Thread Performance

10144 Pts
8766 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2552 Pts
2291 Pts

Need For Speed

i3-9320 vs i5-7600 in Need For Speed using Graphics 448SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9320 i5-7600

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
93.3 FPS
1080p
88.4 FPS
1440p
71.8 FPS
1440p
68.1 FPS
2160p
47.0 FPS
2160p
44.5 FPS
w1440p
63.5 FPS
w1440p
60.2 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
148.6 FPS
1080p
142.0 FPS
1440p
119.1 FPS
1440p
113.8 FPS
2160p
82.9 FPS
2160p
79.1 FPS
w1440p
107.3 FPS
w1440p
102.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
204.0 FPS
1080p
195.6 FPS
1440p
166.4 FPS
1440p
159.6 FPS
2160p
118.9 FPS
2160p
113.7 FPS
w1440p
151.0 FPS
w1440p
144.8 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
314.6 FPS
1080p
302.8 FPS
1440p
260.9 FPS
1440p
251.1 FPS
2160p
190.7 FPS
2160p
183.0 FPS
w1440p
238.6 FPS
w1440p
229.4 FPS
i3-9320
  • The i3-9320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9320 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i5-7600
  • The i5-7600 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-7600 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-7600 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-7600 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-7600 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i3-9320 vs i5-7600 specifications

i3-9320 vs i5-7600 Architecture

i3-9320 i5-7600
CodenameCoffee LakeKaby Lake
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Core i5 (Kaby Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#unknownSR334
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedApr 2019Jan 2017

i3-9320 vs i5-7600 Cache

i3-9320 i5-7600
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L36MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i3-9320 vs i5-7600 Cores

i3-9320 i5-7600
# of Cores44
# of Threads44
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630HD 630
SMP # CPUs11

i3-9320 vs i5-7600 Performance

i3-9320 i5-7600
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier37.0x35.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP62 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzup to 4.1 GHz
Voltagevariableunknown

i3-9320 vs i5-7600 Physical

i3-9320 i5-7600
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA1151
Process Size14 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1151
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i3-9320 vs i5-7600 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments