i3-12100 vs i5-12400 - Need For Speed RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i5-12400

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
16800 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
3240 Pts

Need For Speed

i3-12100 vs i5-12400 in Need For Speed using RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i5-12400

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
193.1 FPS
1080p
201.1 FPS
1440p
151.3 FPS
1440p
157.6 FPS
2160p
103.5 FPS
2160p
107.8 FPS
w1440p
136.3 FPS
w1440p
142.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
272.5 FPS
1080p
281.7 FPS
1440p
222.7 FPS
1440p
230.4 FPS
2160p
162.2 FPS
2160p
167.8 FPS
w1440p
204.2 FPS
w1440p
211.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
351.9 FPS
1080p
362.4 FPS
1440p
294.2 FPS
1440p
303.2 FPS
2160p
220.9 FPS
2160p
227.9 FPS
w1440p
272.1 FPS
w1440p
280.6 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
510.7 FPS
1080p
523.7 FPS
1440p
437.0 FPS
1440p
448.8 FPS
2160p
338.3 FPS
2160p
347.9 FPS
w1440p
407.9 FPS
w1440p
419.2 FPS
i3-12100
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i5-12400
  • The i5-12400 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-12400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-12400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.

Compare i3-12100 vs i5-12400 specifications

i3-12100 vs i5-12400 Architecture

i3-12100 i5-12400
ChipsetsZ690, H670, B660, H610Z690, H670, B660, H610
CodenameAlder Lake-SAlder Lake-S
DDR4 Speed3200 MT/s3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed4800 MT/s4800 MT/s
ECC MemoryNoNo
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i5 (Alder Lake-S)
Launch MSRP$122$199
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
PCI-ExpressGen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only)Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only)
Part#SRL62SRL4V SRL5Y
Production StatusActiveActive
Release DateJan 4th, 2022Jan 4th, 2022

i3-12100 vs i5-12400 Cache

i3-12100 i5-12400
Cache L180K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)1.25MB (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)18MB (shared)

i3-12100 vs i5-12400 Cores

i3-12100 i5-12400
# of Cores46
# of Threads812
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730UHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12100 vs i5-12400 Performance

i3-12100 i5-12400
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.3 GHz2.5 GHz
Multiplier33.0x25.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
PL160W65W
PL289W117W
PL2 Tau Limit28 seconds28 seconds
TDP60 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzup to 4.4 GHz

i3-12100 vs i5-12400 Physical

i3-12100 i5-12400
Die Size163 mm²163 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA16A
Process Size10 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1700
tJMax100°C100°C

Compare i3-12100 vs i5-12400 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments