i3-12100 vs i3-8300 - Need For Speed RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i3-8300

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
8715 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
2172 Pts

Need For Speed

i3-12100 vs i3-8300 in Need For Speed using RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i3-8300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
193.1 FPS
1080p
174.1 FPS
1440p
151.3 FPS
1440p
136.4 FPS
2160p
103.5 FPS
2160p
93.3 FPS
w1440p
136.3 FPS
w1440p
122.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
272.5 FPS
1080p
250.2 FPS
1440p
222.7 FPS
1440p
204.3 FPS
2160p
162.2 FPS
2160p
148.6 FPS
w1440p
204.2 FPS
w1440p
187.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
351.9 FPS
1080p
326.3 FPS
1440p
294.2 FPS
1440p
272.3 FPS
2160p
220.9 FPS
2160p
204.0 FPS
w1440p
272.1 FPS
w1440p
251.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
510.7 FPS
1080p
478.4 FPS
1440p
437.0 FPS
1440p
408.1 FPS
2160p
338.3 FPS
2160p
314.6 FPS
w1440p
407.9 FPS
w1440p
380.5 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12100 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-8300
  • The i3-8300 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-8300 specifications

i3-12100 vs i3-8300 Architecture

i3-12100 i3-8300
CodenameAlder Lake-SCoffee Lake
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i3 (Coffee Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRL62SR3XY
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-12100 vs i3-8300 Cache

i3-12100 i3-8300
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)8MB (shared)

i3-12100 vs i3-8300 Cores

i3-12100 i3-8300
# of Cores44
# of Threads84
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12100 vs i3-8300 Performance

i3-12100 i3-8300
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.3 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier33.0x37.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W62 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzN/A

i3-12100 vs i3-8300 Physical

i3-12100 i3-8300
Die Size163 mm²unknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA1151
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1151

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-8300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments