i3-12100 vs i3-2102 - Need For Speed RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i3-2102

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
3736 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
1623 Pts

Need For Speed

i3-12100 vs i3-2102 in Need For Speed using RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i3-2102

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
193.1 FPS
1080p
82.8 FPS
1440p
151.3 FPS
1440p
64.9 FPS
2160p
103.5 FPS
2160p
44.4 FPS
w1440p
136.3 FPS
w1440p
58.5 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
272.5 FPS
1080p
134.4 FPS
1440p
222.7 FPS
1440p
109.3 FPS
2160p
162.2 FPS
2160p
79.0 FPS
w1440p
204.2 FPS
w1440p
100.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
351.9 FPS
1080p
185.9 FPS
1440p
294.2 FPS
1440p
153.6 FPS
2160p
220.9 FPS
2160p
113.5 FPS
w1440p
272.1 FPS
w1440p
141.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
510.7 FPS
1080p
289.1 FPS
1440p
437.0 FPS
1440p
242.4 FPS
2160p
338.3 FPS
2160p
182.7 FPS
w1440p
407.9 FPS
w1440p
224.6 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12100 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12100 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-2102
  • The i3-2102 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-2102 specifications

i3-12100 vs i3-2102 Architecture

i3-12100 i3-2102
CodenameAlder Lake-SSandy Bridge
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i3 (Sandy Bridge)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRL62SR05D
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i3-12100 vs i3-2102 Cache

i3-12100 i3-2102
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)3MB (shared)

i3-12100 vs i3-2102 Cores

i3-12100 i3-2102
# of Cores42
# of Threads84
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730Intel HD 3000
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12100 vs i3-2102 Performance

i3-12100 i3-2102
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.3 GHz3.1 GHz
Multiplier33.0x31.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzN/A

i3-12100 vs i3-2102 Physical

i3-12100 i3-2102
Die Size163 mm²131 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA10
Process Size10 nm32 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1155

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-2102 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments