i3-10100 vs i5-11400 - Need For Speed Graphics 448SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-10100 i5-11400

Multi-Thread Performance

9549 Pts
14000 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2531 Pts
2700 Pts

Need For Speed

i3-10100 vs i5-11400 in Need For Speed using Graphics 448SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-10100 i5-11400

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
94.5 FPS
1080p
102.9 FPS
1440p
72.7 FPS
1440p
79.2 FPS
2160p
47.5 FPS
2160p
51.8 FPS
w1440p
64.3 FPS
w1440p
70.1 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
150.2 FPS
1080p
161.4 FPS
1440p
120.3 FPS
1440p
129.4 FPS
2160p
83.7 FPS
2160p
90.1 FPS
w1440p
108.4 FPS
w1440p
116.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
206.0 FPS
1080p
219.9 FPS
1440p
168.0 FPS
1440p
179.6 FPS
2160p
119.9 FPS
2160p
128.5 FPS
w1440p
152.5 FPS
w1440p
163.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
317.4 FPS
1080p
336.9 FPS
1440p
263.3 FPS
1440p
280.0 FPS
2160p
192.2 FPS
2160p
205.1 FPS
w1440p
240.8 FPS
w1440p
256.4 FPS
i3-10100
  • The i3-10100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i5-11400
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-10100 vs i5-11400 specifications

i3-10100 vs i5-11400

i3-10100 i5-11400

i3-10100 vs i5-11400 Compatibility

i3-10100 i5-11400

i3-10100 vs i5-11400 General

i3-10100 i5-11400

i3-10100 vs i5-11400 Integrated Graphics

i3-10100 i5-11400

i3-10100 vs i5-11400 Memory Specs

i3-10100 i5-11400

i3-10100 vs i5-11400 Performance

i3-10100 i5-11400
Frequency3.60 GHz2.6 GHz
TDP65 W65 W

i3-10100 vs i5-11400 Technical Specs

i3-10100 i5-11400

i3-10100 vs i5-11400 Technologies and Extensions

i3-10100 i5-11400

i3-10100 vs i5-11400 Virtualization Technologies

i3-10100 i5-11400

Compare i3-10100 vs i5-11400 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments