i9-13900K vs i3-10100 - Need For Speed: Payback GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-13900K i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

34549 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

4683 Pts
2531 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i9-13900K vs i3-10100 in Need For Speed: Payback using GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-13900K i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
80.1 FPS
1080p
67.3 FPS
1440p
54.3 FPS
1440p
48.6 FPS
2160p
37.6 FPS
2160p
33.6 FPS
w1440p
49.1 FPS
w1440p
44.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
130.7 FPS
1080p
112.7 FPS
1440p
93.8 FPS
1440p
85.3 FPS
2160p
68.4 FPS
2160p
62.1 FPS
w1440p
86.1 FPS
w1440p
78.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
181.2 FPS
1080p
158.1 FPS
1440p
133.4 FPS
1440p
122.1 FPS
2160p
99.3 FPS
2160p
90.6 FPS
w1440p
123.1 FPS
w1440p
112.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
282.3 FPS
1080p
248.9 FPS
1440p
212.5 FPS
1440p
195.6 FPS
2160p
161.0 FPS
2160p
147.6 FPS
w1440p
197.1 FPS
w1440p
181.4 FPS
i9-13900K
    i3-10100
    • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
    • The i3-10100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

    Compare i9-13900K vs i3-10100 specifications

    i9-13900K vs i3-10100 Architecture

    i9-13900K i3-10100

    i9-13900K vs i3-10100 Cache

    i9-13900K i3-10100

    i9-13900K vs i3-10100 Cores

    i9-13900K i3-10100

    i9-13900K vs i3-10100 Performance

    i9-13900K i3-10100
    Frequency3 GHz3.60 GHz
    TDP125 W65 W

    i9-13900K vs i3-10100 Physical

    i9-13900K i3-10100

    Compare i9-13900K vs i3-10100 in more games


    Discussion and Comments

    Share Your Comments