i9-12900K vs i5-12400 - Need For Speed: Payback RTX 4080 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-12900K i5-12400

Multi-Thread Performance

28791 Pts
16800 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3903 Pts
3240 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i9-12900K vs i5-12400 in Need For Speed: Payback using RTX 4080 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-12900K i5-12400

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
261.7 FPS
1080p
248.1 FPS
1440p
190.0 FPS
1440p
184.5 FPS
2160p
136.6 FPS
2160p
132.7 FPS
w1440p
174.7 FPS
w1440p
169.7 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
349.4 FPS
1080p
334.6 FPS
1440p
268.9 FPS
1440p
262.5 FPS
2160p
204.6 FPS
2160p
199.7 FPS
w1440p
250.9 FPS
w1440p
245.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
437.1 FPS
1080p
421.0 FPS
1440p
347.8 FPS
1440p
340.4 FPS
2160p
272.6 FPS
2160p
266.7 FPS
w1440p
327.1 FPS
w1440p
320.2 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
612.5 FPS
1080p
593.9 FPS
1440p
505.5 FPS
1440p
496.3 FPS
2160p
408.5 FPS
2160p
400.7 FPS
w1440p
479.5 FPS
w1440p
470.7 FPS
i9-12900K
  • The i9-12900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i9-12900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-12900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-12900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
i5-12400
  • The i5-12400 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i9-12900K vs i5-12400 specifications

i9-12900K vs i5-12400 Architecture

i9-12900K i5-12400
CodenameAlder LakeAlder Lake-S
ECC MemoryNoNo
GenerationCore i9 (Alder Lake-S)Core i5 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4-3200 MHz Dual-channelDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
PCI-ExpressGen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only)Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only)
Part#unknownSRL4V SRL5Y
Production StatusActiveActive
Release DateNov 4th, 2021Jan 4th, 2022

i9-12900K vs i5-12400 Cache

i9-12900K i5-12400
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L214MB (shared)1.25MB (per core)
Cache L330MB (shared)18MB (shared)

i9-12900K vs i5-12400 Cores

i9-12900K i5-12400
# of Cores166
# of Threads2412
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770UHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

i9-12900K vs i5-12400 Performance

i9-12900K i5-12400
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.2 GHz2.5 GHz
Multiplier32.0x25.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.2 GHzup to 4.4 GHz

i9-12900K vs i5-12400 Physical

i9-12900K i5-12400
Die Sizeunknown163 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1700FC-LGA16A
Process Size10 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1700
tJMax100°C100°C

Compare i9-12900K vs i5-12400 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments