i9-12900K vs i3-10300 - Need For Speed: Payback GTX 1650 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-12900K i3-10300

Multi-Thread Performance

28791 Pts
10980 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3903 Pts
2690 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i9-12900K vs i3-10300 in Need For Speed: Payback using GTX 1650 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-12900K i3-10300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
46.9 FPS
1080p
41.6 FPS
1440p
32.3 FPS
1440p
29.9 FPS
2160p
22.1 FPS
2160p
20.4 FPS
w1440p
29.1 FPS
w1440p
26.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
82.8 FPS
1080p
74.7 FPS
1440p
60.0 FPS
1440p
56.1 FPS
2160p
43.2 FPS
2160p
40.3 FPS
w1440p
54.8 FPS
w1440p
51.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
118.7 FPS
1080p
107.7 FPS
1440p
87.7 FPS
1440p
82.4 FPS
2160p
64.2 FPS
2160p
60.1 FPS
w1440p
80.6 FPS
w1440p
75.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
190.4 FPS
1080p
173.9 FPS
1440p
143.2 FPS
1440p
134.8 FPS
2160p
106.3 FPS
2160p
99.8 FPS
w1440p
132.0 FPS
w1440p
124.2 FPS
i9-12900K
    i3-10300
    • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
    • The i3-10300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

    Compare i9-12900K vs i3-10300 specifications

    i9-12900K vs i3-10300 Architecture

    i9-12900K i3-10300

    i9-12900K vs i3-10300 Cache

    i9-12900K i3-10300

    i9-12900K vs i3-10300 Cores

    i9-12900K i3-10300

    i9-12900K vs i3-10300 Performance

    i9-12900K i3-10300
    Frequency3.2 GHz3.70 GHz
    TDP125 W65 W

    i9-12900K vs i3-10300 Physical

    i9-12900K i3-10300

    Compare i9-12900K vs i3-10300 in more games


    Discussion and Comments

    Share Your Comments