i9-12900K vs Ryzen 5 2400G - Need For Speed: Payback RTX 4080 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-12900K Ryzen 5 2400G

Multi-Thread Performance

28791 Pts
9273 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3903 Pts
1926 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i9-12900K vs Ryzen 5 2400G in Need For Speed: Payback using RTX 4080 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-12900K Ryzen 5 2400G

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
261.7 FPS
1080p
186.4 FPS
1440p
190.0 FPS
1440p
138.6 FPS
2160p
136.6 FPS
2160p
99.7 FPS
w1440p
174.7 FPS
w1440p
127.5 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
349.4 FPS
1080p
264.7 FPS
1440p
268.9 FPS
1440p
207.1 FPS
2160p
204.6 FPS
2160p
157.2 FPS
w1440p
250.9 FPS
w1440p
193.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
437.1 FPS
1080p
343.0 FPS
1440p
347.8 FPS
1440p
275.5 FPS
2160p
272.6 FPS
2160p
214.6 FPS
w1440p
327.1 FPS
w1440p
258.8 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
612.5 FPS
1080p
499.5 FPS
1440p
505.5 FPS
1440p
412.5 FPS
2160p
408.5 FPS
2160p
329.6 FPS
w1440p
479.5 FPS
w1440p
390.1 FPS
i9-12900K
  • The i9-12900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-12900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-12900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i9-12900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Ryzen 5 2400G
  • The Ryzen 5 2400G has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The Ryzen 5 2400G is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The Ryzen 5 2400G has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i9-12900K vs Ryzen 5 2400G specifications

i9-12900K vs Ryzen 5 2400G Architecture

i9-12900K Ryzen 5 2400G
CodenameAlder LakeRaven Ridge
GenerationCore i9 (Alder Lake-S)Ryzen 5 (Zen (Raven Ridge))
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4-3200 MHz Dual-channelDDR4
Part#unknownYD2400C5M4MFB
Production StatusActiveActive

i9-12900K vs Ryzen 5 2400G Cache

i9-12900K Ryzen 5 2400G
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L214MB (shared)512K (per core)
Cache L330MB (shared)4MB (shared)

i9-12900K vs Ryzen 5 2400G Cores

i9-12900K Ryzen 5 2400G
# of Cores164
# of Threads248
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770Radeon RX Vega 11
SMP # CPUs11

i9-12900K vs Ryzen 5 2400G Performance

i9-12900K Ryzen 5 2400G
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.2 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplier32.0x36.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.2 GHzup to 3.9 GHz

i9-12900K vs Ryzen 5 2400G Physical

i9-12900K Ryzen 5 2400G
Die Sizeunknown210 mm²
FoundryIntelGlobalFoundries
PackageFC-LGA1700µOPGA-1331
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM4
Transistorsunknown4950 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i9-12900K vs Ryzen 5 2400G in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments