i9-12900K vs Athlon II X3 435 - Need For Speed: Payback RTX 4080 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-12900K Athlon II X3 435

Multi-Thread Performance

28791 Pts
2472 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3903 Pts
1004 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i9-12900K vs Athlon II X3 435 in Need For Speed: Payback using RTX 4080 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-12900K Athlon II X3 435

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
261.7 FPS
1080p
98.6 FPS
1440p
190.0 FPS
1440p
73.3 FPS
2160p
136.6 FPS
2160p
52.7 FPS
w1440p
174.7 FPS
w1440p
67.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
349.4 FPS
1080p
155.7 FPS
1440p
268.9 FPS
1440p
121.2 FPS
2160p
204.6 FPS
2160p
91.5 FPS
w1440p
250.9 FPS
w1440p
112.8 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
437.1 FPS
1080p
212.8 FPS
1440p
347.8 FPS
1440p
169.1 FPS
2160p
272.6 FPS
2160p
130.3 FPS
w1440p
327.1 FPS
w1440p
158.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
612.5 FPS
1080p
327.0 FPS
1440p
505.5 FPS
1440p
264.8 FPS
2160p
408.5 FPS
2160p
207.8 FPS
w1440p
479.5 FPS
w1440p
249.2 FPS
i9-12900K
  • The i9-12900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-12900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-12900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X3 435
  • The Athlon II X3 435 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Athlon II X3 435 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i9-12900K vs Athlon II X3 435 specifications

i9-12900K vs Athlon II X3 435 Architecture

i9-12900K Athlon II X3 435
CodenameAlder LakeRana
GenerationCore i9 (Alder Lake-S)Athlon II X3 (Rana)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4-3200 MHz Dual-channelDDR3
Part#unknownADX435WFK32GIADX435WFGIBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i9-12900K vs Athlon II X3 435 Cache

i9-12900K Athlon II X3 435
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L214MB (shared)512K (per core)

i9-12900K vs Athlon II X3 435 Cores

i9-12900K Athlon II X3 435
# of Cores163
# of Threads243
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i9-12900K vs Athlon II X3 435 Performance

i9-12900K Athlon II X3 435
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.2 GHz2.9 GHz
Multiplier32.0x14.5x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.2 GHzN/A

i9-12900K vs Athlon II X3 435 Physical

i9-12900K Athlon II X3 435
Die Sizeunknown169 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1700µPGA
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown300 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i9-12900K vs Athlon II X3 435 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments