i9-11900K vs Athlon II X2 270 - Need For Speed: Payback GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-11900K Athlon II X2 270

Multi-Thread Performance

23993 Pts
1985 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3253 Pts
1154 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i9-11900K vs Athlon II X2 270 in Need For Speed: Payback using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-11900K Athlon II X2 270

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
60.0 FPS
1080p
25.3 FPS
1440p
42.5 FPS
1440p
18.2 FPS
2160p
29.0 FPS
2160p
12.4 FPS
w1440p
38.2 FPS
w1440p
16.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
102.2 FPS
1080p
48.6 FPS
1440p
76.1 FPS
1440p
36.4 FPS
2160p
54.7 FPS
2160p
26.0 FPS
w1440p
69.4 FPS
w1440p
33.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
144.4 FPS
1080p
71.8 FPS
1440p
109.6 FPS
1440p
54.7 FPS
2160p
80.3 FPS
2160p
39.6 FPS
w1440p
100.6 FPS
w1440p
50.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
228.8 FPS
1080p
118.3 FPS
1440p
176.7 FPS
1440p
91.1 FPS
2160p
131.7 FPS
2160p
66.8 FPS
w1440p
162.9 FPS
w1440p
83.8 FPS
i9-11900K
  • The i9-11900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i9-11900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-11900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-11900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i9-11900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X2 270
  • The Athlon II X2 270 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i9-11900K vs Athlon II X2 270 specifications

i9-11900K vs Athlon II X2 270 Architecture

i9-11900K Athlon II X2 270
CodenameRocket LakeRegor
GenerationCore i9 (Rocket Lake-S) Athlon II X2 (Regor)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR2, DDR3
Part#unknownADX270OCK23GM
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedMar 16th, 2021Jul 2011

i9-11900K vs Athlon II X2 270 Cache

i9-11900K Athlon II X2 270
Cache L164K (per core)128K
Cache L2256K (per core)1MB

i9-11900K vs Athlon II X2 270 Cores

i9-11900K Athlon II X2 270
# of Cores82
# of Threads162
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 750N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i9-11900K vs Athlon II X2 270 Features

i9-11900K Athlon II X2 270
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX 3DNow! SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A AMD64 NX bit AMD-V

i9-11900K vs Athlon II X2 270 Notes

i9-11900K Athlon II X2 270

i9-11900K vs Athlon II X2 270 Performance

i9-11900K Athlon II X2 270
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier35.0x17.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.15 V

i9-11900K vs Athlon II X2 270 Physical

i9-11900K Athlon II X2 270
Die Sizeunknown117 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1200µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown410 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i9-11900K vs Athlon II X2 270 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments
D
D 3 years ago
Where 11900?
0 0