i9-10900K vs i5-14600K - Need For Speed: Payback RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K i5-14600K

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
21168 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
4308 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i9-10900K vs i5-14600K in Need For Speed: Payback using RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K i5-14600K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
146.0 FPS
1080p
156.7 FPS
1440p
106.1 FPS
1440p
109.2 FPS
2160p
76.5 FPS
2160p
78.7 FPS
w1440p
97.7 FPS
w1440p
100.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
216.2 FPS
1080p
229.3 FPS
1440p
165.6 FPS
1440p
169.7 FPS
2160p
125.7 FPS
2160p
128.7 FPS
w1440p
154.5 FPS
w1440p
158.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
286.5 FPS
1080p
301.9 FPS
1440p
225.1 FPS
1440p
230.1 FPS
2160p
174.8 FPS
2160p
178.7 FPS
w1440p
211.3 FPS
w1440p
216.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
426.9 FPS
1080p
447.1 FPS
1440p
344.1 FPS
1440p
351.0 FPS
2160p
273.1 FPS
2160p
278.8 FPS
w1440p
324.9 FPS
w1440p
331.6 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-10900K is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i5-14600K
  • The i5-14600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-14600K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i9-10900K vs i5-14600K specifications

i9-10900K vs i5-14600K Architecture

i9-10900K i5-14600K
CodenameComet LakeRaptor Lake-R
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5

i9-10900K vs i5-14600K Cache

i9-10900K i5-14600K
Cache L164K (per core)80 KB (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)2 MB (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)24 MB (shared)

i9-10900K vs i5-14600K Cores

i9-10900K i5-14600K

i9-10900K vs i5-14600K Features

i9-10900K i5-14600K

i9-10900K vs i5-14600K Notes

i9-10900K i5-14600K

i9-10900K vs i5-14600K Performance

i9-10900K i5-14600K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier37.0x35.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesYes
TDP125 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzup to 5.3 GHz

i9-10900K vs i5-14600K Physical

i9-10900K i5-14600K
Die Sizeunknown257 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1700
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i9-10900K vs i5-14600K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments