i9-10900K vs i5-12400 - Need For Speed: Payback RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K i5-12400

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
16800 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
3240 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i9-10900K vs i5-12400 in Need For Speed: Payback using RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K i5-12400

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
146.0 FPS
1080p
144.1 FPS
1440p
106.1 FPS
1440p
104.7 FPS
2160p
76.5 FPS
2160p
75.5 FPS
w1440p
97.7 FPS
w1440p
96.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
216.2 FPS
1080p
213.9 FPS
1440p
165.6 FPS
1440p
163.8 FPS
2160p
125.7 FPS
2160p
124.3 FPS
w1440p
154.5 FPS
w1440p
152.8 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
286.5 FPS
1080p
283.7 FPS
1440p
225.1 FPS
1440p
222.8 FPS
2160p
174.8 FPS
2160p
173.0 FPS
w1440p
211.3 FPS
w1440p
209.2 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
426.9 FPS
1080p
423.3 FPS
1440p
344.1 FPS
1440p
341.0 FPS
2160p
273.1 FPS
2160p
270.6 FPS
w1440p
324.9 FPS
w1440p
321.9 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i5-12400
  • The i5-12400 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-12400 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i5-12400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i9-10900K vs i5-12400 specifications

i9-10900K vs i5-12400 Architecture

i9-10900K i5-12400
CodenameComet LakeAlder Lake-S
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Core i5 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Part#unknownSRL4V SRL5Y
Production StatusActiveActive

i9-10900K vs i5-12400 Cache

i9-10900K i5-12400
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)1.25MB (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)18MB (shared)

i9-10900K vs i5-12400 Cores

i9-10900K i5-12400
# of Cores106
# of Threads2012
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630UHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs i5-12400 Features

i9-10900K i5-12400

i9-10900K vs i5-12400 Notes

i9-10900K i5-12400

i9-10900K vs i5-12400 Performance

i9-10900K i5-12400
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz2.5 GHz
Multiplier37.0x25.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzup to 4.4 GHz

i9-10900K vs i5-12400 Physical

i9-10900K i5-12400
Die Sizeunknown163 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1700

Compare i9-10900K vs i5-12400 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments