i9-10900K vs i3-7300 - Need For Speed: Payback RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K i3-7300

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
6436 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
2317 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i9-10900K vs i3-7300 in Need For Speed: Payback using RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K i3-7300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
146.0 FPS
1080p
109.8 FPS
1440p
106.1 FPS
1440p
79.8 FPS
2160p
76.5 FPS
2160p
57.6 FPS
w1440p
97.7 FPS
w1440p
73.5 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
216.2 FPS
1080p
170.4 FPS
1440p
165.6 FPS
1440p
130.2 FPS
2160p
125.7 FPS
2160p
98.7 FPS
w1440p
154.5 FPS
w1440p
121.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
286.5 FPS
1080p
231.1 FPS
1440p
225.1 FPS
1440p
180.7 FPS
2160p
174.8 FPS
2160p
139.8 FPS
w1440p
211.3 FPS
w1440p
169.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
426.9 FPS
1080p
352.4 FPS
1440p
344.1 FPS
1440p
281.6 FPS
2160p
273.1 FPS
2160p
222.0 FPS
w1440p
324.9 FPS
w1440p
265.4 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i3-7300
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-7300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i9-10900K vs i3-7300 specifications

i9-10900K vs i3-7300 Architecture

i9-10900K i3-7300
CodenameComet LakeKaby Lake
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Core i3 (Kaby Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#unknownSR359
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedMay 2020Jan 2017

i9-10900K vs i3-7300 Cache

i9-10900K i3-7300
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)4MB (shared)

i9-10900K vs i3-7300 Cores

i9-10900K i3-7300
# of Cores102
# of Threads204
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630Intel HD 630
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs i3-7300 Features

i9-10900K i3-7300
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.1 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x HTT AES-NI TSX CLMUL FMA3

i9-10900K vs i3-7300 Notes

i9-10900K i3-7300

i9-10900K vs i3-7300 Performance

i9-10900K i3-7300
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz4 GHz
Multiplier37.0x40.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W51 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzN/A
Voltagevariableunknown

i9-10900K vs i3-7300 Physical

i9-10900K i3-7300
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA1151
Process Size14 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1151
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax72°C65°C

Compare i9-10900K vs i3-7300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments