i9-10900K vs FX-6200 Six-Core - Need For Speed: Payback GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K FX-6200 Six-Core

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
6126 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
1306 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i9-10900K vs FX-6200 Six-Core in Need For Speed: Payback using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K FX-6200 Six-Core

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
58.1 FPS
1080p
26.1 FPS
1440p
41.9 FPS
1440p
18.8 FPS
2160p
28.6 FPS
2160p
12.8 FPS
w1440p
37.7 FPS
w1440p
16.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
99.4 FPS
1080p
49.9 FPS
1440p
75.1 FPS
1440p
37.5 FPS
2160p
54.0 FPS
2160p
26.7 FPS
w1440p
68.6 FPS
w1440p
34.1 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
140.8 FPS
1080p
73.7 FPS
1440p
108.4 FPS
1440p
56.2 FPS
2160p
79.4 FPS
2160p
40.7 FPS
w1440p
99.5 FPS
w1440p
51.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
223.4 FPS
1080p
121.3 FPS
1440p
174.8 FPS
1440p
93.5 FPS
2160p
130.3 FPS
2160p
68.6 FPS
w1440p
161.3 FPS
w1440p
85.9 FPS
i9-10900K
    FX-6200 Six-Core

      Compare i9-10900K vs FX-6200 Six-Core specifications

      i9-10900K vs FX-6200 Six-Core Architecture

      i9-10900K FX-6200 Six-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-6200 Six-Core Cache

      i9-10900K FX-6200 Six-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-6200 Six-Core Cores

      i9-10900K FX-6200 Six-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-6200 Six-Core Features

      i9-10900K FX-6200 Six-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-6200 Six-Core Notes

      i9-10900K FX-6200 Six-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-6200 Six-Core Performance

      i9-10900K FX-6200 Six-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-6200 Six-Core Physical

      i9-10900K FX-6200 Six-Core

      Compare i9-10900K vs FX-6200 Six-Core in more games


      Discussion and Comments

      Share Your Comments