i5-9600K vs Core2 Duo E7200 - Need For Speed: Payback Graphics 448SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-9600K Core2 Duo E7200

Multi-Thread Performance

13352 Pts
1633 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2677 Pts
1049 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i5-9600K vs Core2 Duo E7200 in Need For Speed: Payback using Graphics 448SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-9600K Core2 Duo E7200

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
93.3 FPS
1080p
36.8 FPS
1440p
67.2 FPS
1440p
26.5 FPS
2160p
46.0 FPS
2160p
18.2 FPS
w1440p
60.6 FPS
w1440p
23.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
148.6 FPS
1080p
67.2 FPS
1440p
112.6 FPS
1440p
50.6 FPS
2160p
81.4 FPS
2160p
36.4 FPS
w1440p
103.1 FPS
w1440p
46.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
204.0 FPS
1080p
97.6 FPS
1440p
157.9 FPS
1440p
74.6 FPS
2160p
116.8 FPS
2160p
54.7 FPS
w1440p
145.5 FPS
w1440p
68.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
314.6 FPS
1080p
158.3 FPS
1440p
248.6 FPS
1440p
122.7 FPS
2160p
187.6 FPS
2160p
91.1 FPS
w1440p
230.5 FPS
w1440p
113.1 FPS
i5-9600K
  • The i5-9600K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-9600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-9600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-9600K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i5-9600K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Core2 Duo E7200
  • The Core2 Duo E7200 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i5-9600K vs Core2 Duo E7200 specifications

i5-9600K vs Core2 Duo E7200 Architecture

i5-9600K Core2 Duo E7200
CodenameCoffee LakeWolfdale
GenerationCore i5 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Core 2 Duo (Wolfdale)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Part#SR3WZSLAPC
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedOct 2018Apr 2008

i5-9600K vs Core2 Duo E7200 Cache

i5-9600K Core2 Duo E7200
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)3MB (shared)

i5-9600K vs Core2 Duo E7200 Cores

i5-9600K Core2 Duo E7200
# of Cores62
# of Threads62
Integrated GraphicsN/AN/A
SMP # CPUs11

i5-9600K vs Core2 Duo E7200 Features

i5-9600K Core2 Duo E7200
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4 Intel 64 C1E C2E EIST

i5-9600K vs Core2 Duo E7200 Notes

i5-9600K Core2 Duo E7200

i5-9600K vs Core2 Duo E7200 Performance

i5-9600K Core2 Duo E7200
Base Clock100 MHz266 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz2.533 GHz
Multiplier37.0x9.5x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP95 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.6 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.11 V

i5-9600K vs Core2 Duo E7200 Physical

i5-9600K Core2 Duo E7200
Die Sizeunknown82 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA6
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 775
Transistorsunknown228 million
tCaseMax72°C74°C

Compare i5-9600K vs Core2 Duo E7200 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments