i5-14600K vs i3-3240 - Need For Speed: Payback Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-14600K i3-3240

Multi-Thread Performance

21168 Pts
4310 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

4308 Pts
1808 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i5-14600K vs i3-3240 in Need For Speed: Payback using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-14600K i3-3240

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
80.3 FPS
1080p
34.6 FPS
1440p
55.6 FPS
1440p
25.0 FPS
2160p
38.8 FPS
2160p
17.4 FPS
w1440p
50.5 FPS
w1440p
22.7 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
130.9 FPS
1080p
63.7 FPS
1440p
95.8 FPS
1440p
48.1 FPS
2160p
70.3 FPS
2160p
35.0 FPS
w1440p
88.2 FPS
w1440p
44.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
181.6 FPS
1080p
92.8 FPS
1440p
135.9 FPS
1440p
71.1 FPS
2160p
101.8 FPS
2160p
52.6 FPS
w1440p
125.9 FPS
w1440p
65.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
282.8 FPS
1080p
151.0 FPS
1440p
216.3 FPS
1440p
117.2 FPS
2160p
164.9 FPS
2160p
87.9 FPS
w1440p
201.3 FPS
w1440p
108.6 FPS
i5-14600K
  • The i5-14600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-14600K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-3240
  • The i3-3240 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i3-3240 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i5-14600K vs i3-3240 specifications

i5-14600K vs i3-3240 Architecture

i5-14600K i3-3240
CodenameRaptor Lake-RIvy Bridge
GenerationCore i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)Core i3 (Ivy Bridge)
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5DDR3

i5-14600K vs i3-3240 Cache

i5-14600K i3-3240
Cache L180 KB (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L22 MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L324 MB (shared)3MB (shared)

i5-14600K vs i3-3240 Core Config

i5-14600K i3-3240

i5-14600K vs i3-3240 Performance

i5-14600K i3-3240
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier35.0x34.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W55 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzN/A

i5-14600K vs i3-3240 Physical

i5-14600K i3-3240
Die Size257 mm²94 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA12C
Process Size10 nm22 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1155
tCaseMax72°C65°C

i5-14600K vs i3-3240 Processor

i5-14600K i3-3240

Compare i5-14600K vs i3-3240 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments