i5-13600K vs i7-9700F - Need For Speed: Payback GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-13600K i7-9700F

Multi-Thread Performance

21168 Pts
17589 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

4308 Pts
2834 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i5-13600K vs i7-9700F in Need For Speed: Payback using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-13600K i7-9700F

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
61.9 FPS
1080p
56.6 FPS
1440p
43.0 FPS
1440p
40.8 FPS
2160p
29.4 FPS
2160p
27.9 FPS
w1440p
38.7 FPS
w1440p
36.7 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
105.0 FPS
1080p
97.2 FPS
1440p
76.8 FPS
1440p
73.4 FPS
2160p
55.3 FPS
2160p
52.9 FPS
w1440p
70.2 FPS
w1440p
67.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
148.0 FPS
1080p
137.9 FPS
1440p
110.7 FPS
1440p
106.1 FPS
2160p
81.2 FPS
2160p
77.8 FPS
w1440p
101.6 FPS
w1440p
97.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
234.1 FPS
1080p
219.1 FPS
1440p
178.3 FPS
1440p
171.3 FPS
2160p
133.1 FPS
2160p
127.8 FPS
w1440p
164.5 FPS
w1440p
158.0 FPS
i5-13600K
  • The i5-13600K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-13600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-13600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-13600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
i7-9700F
  • The i7-9700F is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i7-9700F has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i5-13600K vs i7-9700F specifications

i5-13600K vs i7-9700F Architecture

i5-13600K i7-9700F
CodenameRaptor Lake-SCoffee Lake
GenerationCore i5 (Raptor Lake)Core i7 (Coffee Lake Refresh)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRMBDunknown
Production StatusActiveActive

i5-13600K vs i7-9700F Cache

i5-13600K i7-9700F
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L22MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L324MB (shared)12MB (shared)

i5-13600K vs i7-9700F Cores

i5-13600K i7-9700F
# of Cores148
# of Threads208
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i5-13600K vs i7-9700F Performance

i5-13600K i7-9700F
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier35.0x30.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.1 GHzup to 4.7 GHz

i5-13600K vs i7-9700F Physical

i5-13600K i7-9700F
Die Size257 mm²unknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA14C
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1151
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i5-13600K vs i7-9700F in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments