i5-13600K vs i5-10400 - Need For Speed: Payback RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-13600K i5-10400

Multi-Thread Performance

21168 Pts
12716 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

4308 Pts
2609 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i5-13600K vs i5-10400 in Need For Speed: Payback using RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-13600K i5-10400

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
155.6 FPS
1080p
141.0 FPS
1440p
108.9 FPS
1440p
102.4 FPS
2160p
78.5 FPS
2160p
73.9 FPS
w1440p
100.3 FPS
w1440p
94.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
228.0 FPS
1080p
210.1 FPS
1440p
169.3 FPS
1440p
160.7 FPS
2160p
128.4 FPS
2160p
122.0 FPS
w1440p
158.0 FPS
w1440p
150.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
300.3 FPS
1080p
279.1 FPS
1440p
229.6 FPS
1440p
219.1 FPS
2160p
178.4 FPS
2160p
170.2 FPS
w1440p
215.6 FPS
w1440p
205.6 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
445.1 FPS
1080p
417.2 FPS
1440p
350.4 FPS
1440p
335.8 FPS
2160p
278.3 FPS
2160p
266.4 FPS
w1440p
330.9 FPS
w1440p
317.0 FPS
i5-13600K
  • The i5-13600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-13600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-13600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i5-13600K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i5-10400
  • The i5-10400 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-10400 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i5-10400 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i5-13600K vs i5-10400 specifications

i5-13600K vs i5-10400 Architecture

i5-13600K i5-10400
CodenameRaptor Lake-SComet Lake
GenerationCore i5 (Raptor Lake)Core i5 (Comet Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRMBDunknown
Production StatusActiveActive

i5-13600K vs i5-10400 Cache

i5-13600K i5-10400
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L22MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L324MB (shared)12MB (shared)

i5-13600K vs i5-10400 Cores

i5-13600K i5-10400
# of Cores146
# of Threads2012
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770UHD Graphics 630
SMP # CPUs11

i5-13600K vs i5-10400 Performance

i5-13600K i5-10400
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz2.9 GHz
Multiplier35.0x29.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.1 GHzup to 4.3 GHz

i5-13600K vs i5-10400 Physical

i5-13600K i5-10400
Die Size257 mm²unknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA1200
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1200
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i5-13600K vs i5-10400 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments