i5-13600K vs i3-6100 - Need For Speed: Payback GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-13600K i3-6100

Multi-Thread Performance

21168 Pts
5491 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

4308 Pts
2107 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i5-13600K vs i3-6100 in Need For Speed: Payback using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-13600K i3-6100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
61.9 FPS
1080p
32.2 FPS
1440p
43.0 FPS
1440p
23.2 FPS
2160p
29.4 FPS
2160p
15.9 FPS
w1440p
38.7 FPS
w1440p
20.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
105.0 FPS
1080p
59.9 FPS
1440p
76.8 FPS
1440p
45.0 FPS
2160p
55.3 FPS
2160p
32.4 FPS
w1440p
70.2 FPS
w1440p
41.1 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
148.0 FPS
1080p
87.5 FPS
1440p
110.7 FPS
1440p
66.9 FPS
2160p
81.2 FPS
2160p
48.8 FPS
w1440p
101.6 FPS
w1440p
61.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
234.1 FPS
1080p
142.8 FPS
1440p
178.3 FPS
1440p
110.5 FPS
2160p
133.1 FPS
2160p
81.7 FPS
w1440p
164.5 FPS
w1440p
101.7 FPS
i5-13600K
  • The i5-13600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-13600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-13600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i5-13600K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-6100
  • The i3-6100 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-6100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i5-13600K vs i3-6100 specifications

i5-13600K vs i3-6100 Architecture

i5-13600K i3-6100
CodenameRaptor Lake-SSkylake
GenerationCore i5 (Raptor Lake)Core i3 (Skylake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRMBDSR2HG
Production StatusActiveActive

i5-13600K vs i3-6100 Cache

i5-13600K i3-6100
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L22MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L324MB (shared)4MB (shared)

i5-13600K vs i3-6100 Cores

i5-13600K i3-6100
# of Cores142
# of Threads204
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770Intel HD 530
SMP # CPUs11

i5-13600K vs i3-6100 Performance

i5-13600K i3-6100
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier35.0x37.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W51 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.1 GHzN/A

i5-13600K vs i3-6100 Physical

i5-13600K i3-6100
Die Size257 mm²150 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16A
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1151
tCaseMax72°C65°C

Compare i5-13600K vs i3-6100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments