i5-13600K vs Phenom II X4 805 - Need For Speed: Payback GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-13600K Phenom II X4 805

Multi-Thread Performance

21168 Pts
2994 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

4308 Pts
869 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i5-13600K vs Phenom II X4 805 in Need For Speed: Payback using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-13600K Phenom II X4 805

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
61.9 FPS
1080p
21.1 FPS
1440p
43.0 FPS
1440p
15.2 FPS
2160p
29.4 FPS
2160p
10.4 FPS
w1440p
38.7 FPS
w1440p
13.7 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
105.0 FPS
1080p
41.5 FPS
1440p
76.8 FPS
1440p
31.1 FPS
2160p
55.3 FPS
2160p
22.3 FPS
w1440p
70.2 FPS
w1440p
28.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
148.0 FPS
1080p
61.8 FPS
1440p
110.7 FPS
1440p
47.0 FPS
2160p
81.2 FPS
2160p
34.1 FPS
w1440p
101.6 FPS
w1440p
43.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
234.1 FPS
1080p
102.5 FPS
1440p
178.3 FPS
1440p
78.8 FPS
2160p
133.1 FPS
2160p
57.9 FPS
w1440p
164.5 FPS
w1440p
72.5 FPS
i5-13600K
  • The i5-13600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-13600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-13600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-13600K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Phenom II X4 805
  • The Phenom II X4 805 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Phenom II X4 805 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i5-13600K vs Phenom II X4 805 specifications

i5-13600K vs Phenom II X4 805 Architecture

i5-13600K Phenom II X4 805
CodenameRaptor Lake-SDeneb
GenerationCore i5 (Raptor Lake)Phenom II X4 (Deneb)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRMBDHDX805WFK4FGI
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i5-13600K vs Phenom II X4 805 Cache

i5-13600K Phenom II X4 805
Cache L180K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L22MB (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L324MB (shared)4MB (shared)

i5-13600K vs Phenom II X4 805 Cores

i5-13600K Phenom II X4 805
# of Cores144
# of Threads204
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i5-13600K vs Phenom II X4 805 Performance

i5-13600K Phenom II X4 805
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz2.5 GHz
Multiplier35.0x12.5x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.1 GHzN/A

i5-13600K vs Phenom II X4 805 Physical

i5-13600K Phenom II X4 805
Die Size257 mm²258 mm²
PackageFC-LGA16AµPGA
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i5-13600K vs Phenom II X4 805 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments